14
$\begingroup$

Last week, I read Wikipedia's article on Alexander Grothendieck. It lists his twelve greatest contributions to mathematics as accounted for in Grothendieck's own Récoltes et Semailles. The final item on this list is

The "schematic" or "arithmetic" point of view for regular polyhedra and regular configurations of all kinds.

A quick search revealed an unanswered MathStackExchange post with the same question, from 12 years ago!

Can anyone elaborate on this statement, or recommend a treatment of this topic?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

11
$\begingroup$

Too long for a comment. I did a search in French and German but it didn't help much. I think this might have to do with the topic of "polyhedra over finite fields".

Someone asked the same question in French here. The answers like to a post by user Mauricio (answering a question about what Grothendieck had to do with the icosahedron) which says:

Grothedieck a exploré plusieurs facettes du problème. L'une d'entre-elle est le théorème de Brieskorn-Grothendieck. Klein dans son livre sur l'icosaèdre à montré qe si tu prends un polyèdre régulier et que tu relèves son groupe de symétrie dans SU(2), tu obtiens un groupe dont l'algèbre des invariants est celui d'une variété singulière. Tu retrouves comme ça les singularités A,D,E. Une bonne référence est simplement Klein.

(see the link for more)

Grothendieck explored several facets of the problem. One of them is the Brieskorn-Grothendieck theorem. Klein in his book on the icosahedron showed that if you take a regular polyhedron and lift its symmetry group into SU(2), you obtain a group whose algebra of invariants is that of a singular variety. You thus find the A, D, E singularities. A good reference is simply Klein.

However, I don't think this is what the Wikipedia article means. There is also another MathOverflow question on the topic of Grothendieck and polyhedra which seems closer to what you are looking for.

In Grothendieck's Sketch of a Programme he spends a few pages discussing polyhedra over arbitrary rings and concludes with some intriguing remarks on specializing polyhedra over their "most singular characteristics". I am having trouble understanding what he means or finding other references.

You may find further information in the comments and answer to that question. Here is a link to a 2023 paper which attempts to understand and interpret what he was talking about (the case of polyhedra over finite fields).

$\endgroup$
4
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Would be cool to have the same answer over at MSE. I will give you the bounty then which expires soon. (Yes it's not a complete answer, but a huge step!) $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 20 at 3:59
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ In particular the linked paper from the last paragraph! $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 20 at 4:08
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I don't know if the author of the paper is a MathOverflow user, but he seems to be a student of @Will Sawin $\endgroup$
    – Flounderer
    Commented Nov 20 at 5:24
  • $\begingroup$ @MartinBrandenburg, Flounderer - My comment on the linked Question may or may not be helpful, in the context of that 2023 paper. (I don't know some of the things they're talking about.) $\endgroup$
    – mr_e_man
    Commented Nov 25 at 5:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .