Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Algebraic and topological K-theory, relations with topology, commutative algebra, and operator algebras
10
votes
Accepted
Easy way to define positive higher K groups?
There is a definition of $K^n$ for positive $n$, without Bott periodicity. This approach goes back to Karoubi, and you can find it in his book "K-theory". The definition (for both, positive and negati …
4
votes
Chern character of the index bundle for a family of Dirac operators
Your question is not so clearly stated; so I take the opportunity to interpret it and write a little essay.
As far as I understand your question, you found out that the multiplicativity result by "Bo …
4
votes
Accepted
Euler characteristics and the difference bundle construction
You missed that the sequence is not exact at $K(X,Y)$ (neither is it exact at $K(Y)$, but that does not matter here). There is an ambiguity coming from $K^{-1} (Y)$, i.e. automorphisms of bundles. If …
5
votes
Triviality of direct multiples of flat complex vector bundles
As you already said, if $E$ is flat of rank $r$, then $ch(E)=0$, meaning that the class $[E] \in K^0 (X)$ is torsion and therefore $m[E]=0 \in K^0(X)$ for some $m$. Pick $m$ such that $mr >> dim X$.
…
5
votes
filtration in K-theory and ordinary cohomology
You seem to misunderstand the grading a bit. Look at $X=CP^2$ and the $K$-theory class $H-1$, where $H$ is the Hopf bundle. Then $ch(H-1)= 1+z+\frac{z^2}{2}-1$, with $z$ a generator of $H^2 (CP^2;Z)$. …
7
votes
Accepted
Understanding the analytic index map of the Atiyah-Singer index theorem
The Fredholm index of an elliptic operator only depends on the symbol class. Here is the proof (which I memorize from Lawson-Michelsohn and Atiyah-Singer).
If $D: \Gamma(E_0) \to \Gamma(E_1)$ has ord …
16
votes
Accepted
Homotopy spheres with vanishing and non-vanishing $\alpha$-invariant
If $M$ is a homotopy sphere of dimension $4k>0$, then the signature is clearly zero. By the Hirzebruch signature theorem, you get $0=\langle L_k (TM); [M] \rangle = b_k \langle p_k (TM); [M] \rangle$ …
5
votes
Accepted
index of a family of Dirac operators in $K^1$
Whether the following is useful might depend on your concrete example. Because you are mentioning $K^1 $ instead of $K^0$, I assume that your Dirac operator is ungraded (if it is graded, the index sho …
9
votes
Fundamental class in K-theory and orientability
Ad question 1: Let $E$ be any ring spectrum, with associated cohomology and homology theory.
An $E$-orientation of a rank $n$ vector bundle $V \to X$ is a class $u \in E^n (V,V-0)$ such that the restr …