Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 83901

first-order and higher-order logic, model theory, set theory, proof theory, computability theory, formal languages, definability, interplay of syntax and semantics, constructive logic, intuitionism, philosophical logic, modal logic, completeness, Gödel incompleteness, decidability, undecidability, theories of truth, truth revision, consistency.

2 votes
Accepted

Can we have a theory $T$ that is complete for simple sentences in the language of $T$ that a...

Unless I'm missing something, every sentence is equivalent to a simple sentence. To see this, take a sentence $\varphi$ and produce an equivalent sentence $\psi$ by the following procedure: Let $x$ be …
James E Hanson's user avatar
3 votes

Is there a notion of Skolemization for continuous logic?

Many of the things you might want to do with Skolemization (such as producing Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski models) can be done by passing to a discretization of your theory and then Skolemizing there. Withou …
James E Hanson's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Can we re-write every effective first order theory using finitely many primitives?

The theory of the (full) random hypergraph is a counterexample. (Full meaning we are allowing any arity.) The language consists of a relation symbol $E_n$ for each $n \geq 1$ (sometimes people start …
James E Hanson's user avatar
1 vote

Does every uncountably categorical theory have a $\varnothing$-definable strongly minimal im...

I honestly thought about a lot of different possible counterexamples before realizing that a small modification of the structure I already mentioned gives a counterexample. Specifically if we consider …
James E Hanson's user avatar
3 votes

A generalization of Vaught's two cardinal theorem

In case anyone else is wondering about this very specific question, I found a relevant paper but also a counterexample (which I believe actually invalidates one of the results in that paper). The cou …
James E Hanson's user avatar
5 votes

ω-categorical, ω-stable structure with trivial geometry not definable in the pure set

This is a follow-up to Szymon Toruńczyk's answer in which I will prove the claims in it. Proposition. $\mathrm{Th}(M)$ is totally categorical with trivial geometry. Proof. First, note that $M = \mathr …
James E Hanson's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Is the set of ordinals in Double Extension Set Theory really a set?

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something, but it should be the case that $\beta \in_2 \mathbf{S}_1$ is equivalent to $S_1(\beta)$. Therefore the defining formula of $\mathbf{ORD}$ can be written as $$\m …
James E Hanson's user avatar
7 votes

Measure of the numbers with length of $n$ for a nonstandard number $n$

As requested this is a slightly more detailed answer to your first question. I really don't know how to approach your second question. By a mild variation Vaught's two cardinal to get a model $N$ of …
James E Hanson's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Complexity of deciding if an incomplete first-order theory has a stable completion

EDIT: Thanks to tomasz's comment I realized I was making this more complicated than it needed to be. Here is a simpler construction: Let $\mathcal{L}=\{\leq_i\}_{i<\omega}$ be a countable sequence of …
James E Hanson's user avatar
3 votes

Construction of a model of $ZFC+\neg Con(ZFC)$

As has been discussed in the comments, there is no inner model or forcing-like construction that will give you a model, since the collection of natural numbers needs to grow. You'll have to tell me if …
James E Hanson's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Sizes of "nearly amorphous" models

Amorphicity implies strong minimality and $\omega$-categoricity, which together imply $\kappa$-amorphicity for any $\kappa$. Assume that $T$ is amorphic. To see that $T$ is $\omega$-categorical, we pr …
James E Hanson's user avatar
5 votes

Hyperimaginaries and continuous logic

In general a $T^{eq}$ construction in continuous logic, as it's typically defined, can only possibly add hyperimaginaries corresponding to equivalence relations defined by countable partial types. If …
James E Hanson's user avatar
14 votes

Can ultraproducts avoid all "factor structures"?

I realized there's an easier example that doesn't need a measurable cardinal. Consider the language $\def\Lc{\mathcal{L}}\Lc$ which consists of unary predicates $U_n$ for each $n<\omega$. Consider the …
James E Hanson's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Variable elimination for propositional formulas in Heyting algebras

The answer for $\bigwedge_t$ is no. Perhaps the idea here can be adapted to $\bigvee_t$. Consider the propositional formula $t \vee (t \to x)$ in the complete Heyting algebra of open subsets of $\math …
James E Hanson's user avatar
8 votes

Quantifier complexity of definition of compactness

Often the way you prove that something isn't formalizable in first-order logic is (ironically enough) with a compactness proof. This is how you show, for instance, that there isn't a first-order theor …
James E Hanson's user avatar

15 30 50 per page