Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 7743
6 votes
Accepted

Vopenka's Principle at Small Cardinals

If $\kappa$ is almost huge (another large cardinal property), then for each family of size $\kappa$ of graphs of size $<\kappa$, one of the graphs embeds into another one from the family. See this p …
Stefan Geschke's user avatar
3 votes

On the large cardinals foundations of categories

First of all, most people would be rather unhappy with a chain like yours of countable models of ZFC. You can do mathematics in these countable models, but it is still mind bending. An inaccessible c …
Stefan Geschke's user avatar
3 votes

Measurable cardinals under Axiom of Determinacy

For $\omega_1$ the argument is as follows: Consider the filter generated by all closed and unbounded subsets of $\omega_1$. Under AD, this filter is an ultrafilter (this is due to Solovay). The filt …
Stefan Geschke's user avatar
3 votes

Large Cardinals Imply a Model of ZFC

Just one clarification to Guillaume's answer (his answer has been edited by now): Yes, a model of ZFC is a set $E$ together with a binary relation $R$ on $E$ such that $(E,R)$ satisfies ZFC. The rela …
Stefan Geschke's user avatar
3 votes

What is the consistency strength of the failure of square, in terms of large cardinals

I just this minute read in a paper by Sharon and Viale that Schimmerling has shown the failure of $\square(\aleph_n)$ for two consecutive $n$ implies projective determinacy and hence the consistency o …
Stefan Geschke's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

Is there a least-fixed-point formulation of inaccessible cardinals?

Every inaccessible cardinal is a fixed point of the operation $P$ that assigns to every set $X$ of ordinals the set $P(X)=\{2^{|\alpha|}:\alpha\in X\}\cup\bigcup X$. On the other hand, every (nonempty …
Stefan Geschke's user avatar
7 votes

Tractability of forcing-invariant statements under large cardinals

There are two ingredients in your question: First, statements invariant under forcing and second, large cardinals. The existence of certain large cardinals is a strengthening of ZFC. Somewhat surpri …
Stefan Geschke's user avatar
8 votes

Applications of infinite Ramsey's Theorem (on N)?

Matousek showed that for every $K\gneq 1$ every infinite metric space $X$ has an infinite subspace that either embeds into the real line by a $K$-bi-Lipschitz function or in which the distances of any …
Stefan Geschke's user avatar
31 votes

Arguments against large cardinals

First of all, why is it so unreasonable to think that ZFC itself is contradictory? Because we have a good intuition about sets and we have a lot of experience with ZFC. The same basically applies to …
Stefan Geschke's user avatar
20 votes

Should there be a true model of set theory?

As was pointed out in some answers to this question, since the large cardinal axiom are linearly ordered by consistency strength, there is a natural direction in which we can strengthen set theory. Si …
Stefan Geschke's user avatar