Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
6
votes
Accepted
Vopenka's Principle at Small Cardinals
If $\kappa$ is almost huge (another large cardinal property), then for each family of size $\kappa$
of graphs of size $<\kappa$, one of the graphs embeds into another one from the family. See
this p …
3
votes
On the large cardinals foundations of categories
First of all, most people would be rather unhappy with a chain like yours of countable models of ZFC. You can do mathematics in these countable models, but it is still mind bending.
An inaccessible c …
3
votes
Measurable cardinals under Axiom of Determinacy
For $\omega_1$ the argument is as follows: Consider the filter generated by all closed and unbounded subsets of $\omega_1$. Under AD, this filter is an ultrafilter (this is due to Solovay). The filt …
3
votes
Large Cardinals Imply a Model of ZFC
Just one clarification to Guillaume's answer (his answer has been edited by now): Yes, a model of ZFC is a set
$E$ together with a binary relation $R$ on $E$ such that $(E,R)$ satisfies ZFC.
The rela …
3
votes
What is the consistency strength of the failure of square, in terms of large cardinals
I just this minute read in a paper by Sharon and Viale that Schimmerling has shown the failure of $\square(\aleph_n)$ for two consecutive $n$ implies projective determinacy and hence the consistency o …
15
votes
Accepted
Is there a least-fixed-point formulation of inaccessible cardinals?
Every inaccessible cardinal is a fixed point of the operation $P$
that assigns to every set $X$ of ordinals the set $P(X)=\{2^{|\alpha|}:\alpha\in X\}\cup\bigcup X$.
On the other hand, every (nonempty …
7
votes
Tractability of forcing-invariant statements under large cardinals
There are two ingredients in your question: First, statements invariant under forcing and second, large cardinals. The existence of certain large cardinals is a strengthening of ZFC.
Somewhat surpri …
8
votes
Applications of infinite Ramsey's Theorem (on N)?
Matousek showed that for every $K\gneq 1$ every infinite metric space $X$ has an infinite subspace that either embeds into the real line by a $K$-bi-Lipschitz function or in which the distances of any …
31
votes
Arguments against large cardinals
First of all, why is it so unreasonable to think that ZFC itself is contradictory? Because
we have a good intuition about sets and we have a lot of experience with ZFC. The same basically applies to …
20
votes
Should there be a true model of set theory?
As was pointed out in some answers to this question, since the large cardinal axiom are linearly ordered by consistency strength, there is a natural direction in which we can strengthen set theory.
Si …