Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Questions about abstract measure and Lebesgue integral theory. Also concerns such properties as measurability of maps and sets.
7
votes
Accepted
Borel $\sigma$-algebra of a Borel subset
The problem is that you have to take uncountable unions of sets of the form $[a,b) \times [c,d)$ to get every open set in the Sorgenfrey plane, so the $\sigma$-algebra generated by $[a,b) \times [c,d) …
2
votes
Accepted
Every tight $\tau$-additive finite measure is Radon
It seems that the part you're having trouble with is proving that the restriction of a bounded $\tau$-additive Borel measure to a Borel subset is $\tau$-additive (and you can follow the rest of Bogach …
5
votes
Existence of a strange measure
This can be proved without introducing ultrafilters by name, by doing "finitary measure theory" and using Zorn's lemma.
An algebra $A$ on a set $X$ is just a $\sigma$-algebra without the $\sigma$, i …
2
votes
Is a tight finite measure necessarily separately-valued and uniquely determined by its chara...
I decided not to "comment-answer" this question, so other people have duplicated some of my answer in the comments.
Since there are several questions, I will separate them and answer them individually …
6
votes
Exponential objects in the category of measurable spaces
It is also possible to show that the category of measurable spaces, $\newcommand{\Mble}{\mathbf{Mble}}\Mble$, is not cartesian closed by using more category theory and less measure theory (though stil …
3
votes
Accepted
Conditions under which a linear functional on a space of measures must be integration of a f...
If you work in terms of topologies on M, then the way to go is to use the theory of dualities from functional analysis. The basic theory of these things can be found in books called "Topological Vecto …
13
votes
Accepted
Is there a measure on $[0,1]$ that is 0 on meagre sets and 1 on co-meagre sets
The answer is no. Assume that such a measure $\mu$ exists.
First, since every singleton in $[0,1]$ is closed with empty interior, $\mu(\{x\}) = 0$ for all $x \in [0,1]$. Write $B_{x,\epsilon}$ for th …
15
votes
Accepted
Is defining measures as functionals ever insufficiently general in practice?
The first time I taught myself rigorous measure theory, I used the "linear functionals on $C(X)$" approach for compact Hausdorff spaces, so I got first-hand knowledge of where it doesn't work for prob …
4
votes
Accepted
Finitely additive measures on Boolean algebras of regular open subsets: Is there a relations...
The fact you are probably looking for is that, for any Baire space $X$ (e.g. a completely metrizable space or a compact Hausdorff space) the inclusion map $\mathfrak{R}(X) \rightarrow \mathfrak{B}o(X) …
2
votes
Properties of measures that are not countably additive but have countably additive null ideals
$\newcommand{\N}{\mathbb{N}}\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}$There are examples on $\R$ with the Borel $\sigma$-algebra $\mathcal{B}$. We take the null ideal to be the meagre Borel sets $\mathcal{M}$ (the …
9
votes
A characterization of $L_1(\mu)$ in $L_\infty(\mu)^*$
The criterion suggested in the question works fine for $\sigma$-finite spaces, and Michael Greinecker's answer is correct under this assumption.
However, the suggested criterion is not (provably) suf …
5
votes
Accepted
What is to Stone space of the free sigma-algebra on countably many generators?
You got a wrong answer on Math Stackexchange from Daron. The free Boolean algebra on countably many generators is the Boolean algebra of clopens of $2^\omega$ (topologized with the product topology), …
0
votes
Accepted
Is the boundary of an open set in a $\sigma$-space empty?
In effect, you are asking if $\bigvee\limits_{i \in \omega}B_i = \bigcup\limits_{i \in \omega}B_i$, where the left hand side is the closure of the union, which is the join/supremum of the family $\{B_ …
1
vote
Accepted
(non) separability of the power set
The question has a trivial negative answer, as long as an atomlessly measurable cardinal exists (if one doesn't it is vacuously true, of course). Given an atomless probability measure $\mu$ on $(Y, \m …
6
votes
Accepted
A group where the Weil topology induced by the Haar measure does not coincide with the origi...
There are no such locally compact groups, because if $G$ is a locally compact group under the topology $\tau$, then the Weil topology $\tau_\mu$ defined by the Haar measure $\mu$ is the same as the or …