Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 46140
10 votes
Accepted

What is the formula for $\mathcal P_{n}^{k} (a_{1}, a_{2}, ...)$, defined by Peter Luschny?

$P_n$ is given as $$P_n(f) = \sum_{\lambda \,\vdash\, n} (-1)^{\lambda_1} \prod \binom{\lambda_j}{\lambda_{j+1}} f_{j}^{\lambda_j}$$ where the sum is over partitions $\lambda = \lambda_1 \ge \lambda_ …
Peter Taylor's user avatar
  • 7,226
3 votes
Accepted

Determinant of matrix with Stirling numbers as elements

If we take a general sequence of (unsigned) Comtet numbers of the first kind [1, 2] $$c(n, k) = e_{n-k}(\xi_1, \ldots, \xi_n)$$ then the $n \times n$ submatrix with a row offset of $k$ has determinant …
Peter Taylor's user avatar
  • 7,226
8 votes
Accepted

Divisibility of Stirling numbers

The Stirling numbers of the first kind satisfy $x^{\underline{n}} = \sum_{k=0}^n s_1(n,k)x^k$. For $n > 0$ we have $s_1(n, 0) = 0$, $s_1(n, 1) = (-1)^{n-1}(n-1)!$, $s_1(n, n) = 1$. If $n > 1$ then $1^ …
Peter Taylor's user avatar
  • 7,226
2 votes
Accepted

Could you please confirm or deny two identities involving weighted Stirling numbers of the s...

$R(n, k, -\tfrac k2)$ is just the central factorial number $T(n, k)$. (Given the definition of the central factorial numbers, it may be more natural to use them in your context than $R$). Consider A13 …
Peter Taylor's user avatar
  • 7,226
3 votes
Accepted

A question on signed Stirling numbers of the first kind

There is some $N(k, p)$ such that $n \ge N(k, p) \implies s(n, k) \equiv 0 \pmod p$. Proof is straightforward by fixing $p$ and using induction on $k$ via the recurrence $$s(n, k) = s(n-1, k-1) - (n-1 …
Peter Taylor's user avatar
  • 7,226