Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Questions related to permutations, bijections from a finite (or sometimes infinite) set to itself.
1
vote
Ordering and place in sets
A quick computer program throws up a counter-example for $n=2$, $k=4$: take subsets $\{1\}, \{1, 2, 3\}, \{2\}, \{3\}$. The maximum score of $\frac{115}{36}$ is obtained by $(1, 2, 3, 4)$, $(1, 3, 2, …
3
votes
Vandermonde $V_n$ mod $n$
OP asked me to fill in the details of my comment, and in attempting to do so I realised that I claimed too much. However, a very similar argument proves a weaker result which is strong enough to suppo …
4
votes
Accepted
Property of some permutations of non-negative integers such that $a(n)<2^k$ iff $n<2^k$
I'm going to use $\operatorname{msb}$ (for most significant bit) as an alias of $f$.
Since $q_i$ is a permutation, the property that $q_i(n)<2^k$ iff $n < 2^k$ is equivalent to $\operatorname{msb}(q_i …
2
votes
Accepted
Relationship between fixed points and inversions in permutations
Looking at permutations with $j−1$ inversions we get $S_\beta=\{1432,2341,2413,3142,3214,4123\}$ and $S_\delta=\{2341,2413,3142,4123\}$, which is a counterexample to the conjecture in the question. … I've tested it numerically up to $n=28$, and by examining those data I conjecture that the expected number of inversions for a permutation uniformly selected from permutations on $n$ elements with $k …
3
votes
Accepted
Permutation of the natural numbers from operation related to binary expansion of $n$
$\ell(0)$ is problematic, so I will assume that you actually mean to restrict to positive integers rather than natural numbers.
We can rephrase the construction of $a(n)$ to emphasise the increment: l …