Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 4231

Linear representations of algebras and groups, Lie theory, associative algebras, multilinear algebra.

85 votes

Motivating the Casimir element

Maybe I should try to defend myself, or at least the self I was four decades ago when I improvised my graduate text. But first I should disclaim any originality in the proof of Weyl's theorem, which …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
50 votes
5 answers
9k views

What role does the "dual Coxeter number" play in Lie theory (and should it be called the "Ka...

While trying to get some perspective on the extensive literature about highest weight modules for affine Lie algebras relative to "level" (work by Feigin, E. Frenkel, Gaitsgory, Kac, ....), I run into …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
47 votes
Accepted

What is significant about the half-sum of positive roots?

I don't think there is a one-line answer to this question, since it depends a lot on the direction from which you approach semi-simple Lie theory. For one thing, it's probably best at first to empha …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
41 votes
2 answers
2k views

Implications of non-negativity of coefficients of arbitrary Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials?

In their seminal 1979 paper Representations of Coxeter groups and Hecke algebras (Invent. Math. 53, doi:10.1007/BF01390031), Kazhdan and Lusztig studied an arbitrary Coxeter group $(W,S)$ and the corr …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
39 votes
Accepted

Rep Theory Consequences of Bott--Weil--Borel

It's always a good idea to ask (as students typically do) why one is studying a particular subject or theorem. Here are some of my views, from the algebraic side of representation theory: 1) The or …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
31 votes
4 answers
3k views

What was Casimir's precise role in describing the center of the universal enveloping algebra...

This question is prompted by a recent MO question on explicit computations of Weyl group invariants for certain exceptional simple Lie algebras: 37602. Like some others who started graduate study in …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
29 votes

Why aren't representations of monoids studied so much?

One implicit aspect of the question is the intrinsic interest of studying monoid representations. This is addressed by Qiaochu's answer and comments on it. But I'd emphasize more the role of appli …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
26 votes
1 answer
2k views

Example of non-projective variety with non-semisimple Frobenius action on etale cohomology?

This question was motivated by a more general question raised by Jan Weidner here. In general one starts with a variety $X$ (say smooth) over an algebraic closure of a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$ of …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
24 votes
Accepted

What to do now that Lusztig's and James' conjectures have been shown to be false?

The questions raised here will probably need some substantial research papers to answer, inventing new approaches and methods. In any case, the question of what to do about "small" primes has be …
22 votes
Accepted

On the full reducibility of representations of reductive Lie algebras

The statement is false. The standard definition of "reductive" for a finite dimensional Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ over an arbitrary field of characteristic 0 is given in a number of equivalent ways …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
22 votes
Accepted

Cohomology of Flag Varieties

Borel's lengthy 1953 Annals paper is essentially his 1952 Paris thesis. It was followed by work of Bott, Samelson, Kostant, and others, which eventually answers your side question affirmatively. …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
21 votes
Accepted

Why the BGG category O?

I'd add to what Ben says the observation that people have found a number of different module categories valuable for different purposes within this same Lie algebra context. (And some Lie theory pe …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
20 votes
0 answers
761 views

Should the Dynkin diagrams of types $A_1$ and $B_2$ be labelled $C_1$ and $C_2$?

The labels $A$--$G$ attached to connected Dynkin diagrams are of course arbitrary, the result of historical accidents. In order to avoid repetitions, the four infinite families $A_\ell, B_\ell, C_ …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
20 votes

Why are $S$-arithmetic groups interesting?

Motivation in mathematics is always a tricky question, but I'd call attention to one name you've omitted from your list: Serre. It's definitely worthwhile to look at his paper Cohomologie des groupe …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
19 votes

Weyl group actions on 0-weight spaces

This is a reasonable question, and there has been some relevant literature over many decades. But my impression is that no definitive answer has been given, even for the classical types. I've int …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar

1
2 3 4 5
24
15 30 50 per page