Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Linear representations of algebras and groups, Lie theory, associative algebras, multilinear algebra.
85
votes
Motivating the Casimir element
Maybe I should try to defend myself, or at least the self I was four decades ago when I improvised my graduate text. But first I should disclaim any originality in the proof of Weyl's theorem, which …
50
votes
5
answers
9k
views
What role does the "dual Coxeter number" play in Lie theory (and should it be called the "Ka...
While trying to get some perspective on the extensive literature about highest weight modules for affine Lie algebras relative to "level" (work by Feigin, E. Frenkel, Gaitsgory, Kac, ....), I run into …
47
votes
Accepted
What is significant about the half-sum of positive roots?
I don't think there is a one-line answer to this question, since it depends a lot on the direction from which you approach semi-simple Lie theory. For one thing, it's probably best at first to empha …
41
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Implications of non-negativity of coefficients of arbitrary Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials?
In their seminal 1979 paper Representations of Coxeter groups and Hecke algebras (Invent. Math. 53, doi:10.1007/BF01390031),
Kazhdan and Lusztig studied an arbitrary Coxeter group $(W,S)$ and the corr …
39
votes
Accepted
Rep Theory Consequences of Bott--Weil--Borel
It's always a good idea to ask (as students typically do) why one is studying a particular subject or theorem. Here are some of my views, from the algebraic side of representation theory:
1) The or …
31
votes
4
answers
3k
views
What was Casimir's precise role in describing the center of the universal enveloping algebra...
This question is prompted by a recent MO question on explicit computations of Weyl group invariants for certain exceptional simple Lie algebras:
37602. Like some others who started graduate study in …
29
votes
Why aren't representations of monoids studied so much?
One implicit aspect of the question is the intrinsic interest of studying monoid representations. This is addressed by Qiaochu's answer and comments on it. But I'd emphasize more the role of appli …
26
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Example of non-projective variety with non-semisimple Frobenius action on etale cohomology?
This question was motivated by a more general question raised by Jan Weidner here. In general one starts with a variety $X$ (say smooth) over an algebraic closure of a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$ of …
24
votes
Accepted
What to do now that Lusztig's and James' conjectures have been shown to be false?
The questions raised here will probably need some substantial research papers to answer, inventing new approaches and methods. In any case, the question of what to do about "small" primes has be …
22
votes
Accepted
On the full reducibility of representations of reductive Lie algebras
The statement is false. The standard definition of "reductive" for a finite dimensional Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ over an arbitrary field of characteristic 0 is given in a number of equivalent ways …
22
votes
Accepted
Cohomology of Flag Varieties
Borel's lengthy 1953 Annals paper is essentially his 1952 Paris thesis. It was
followed by work of Bott, Samelson, Kostant, and others, which eventually answers your
side question affirmatively. …
21
votes
Accepted
Why the BGG category O?
I'd add to what Ben says the observation that people have found a number of different module categories valuable for different purposes within this same Lie algebra context. (And some Lie theory pe …
20
votes
0
answers
761
views
Should the Dynkin diagrams of types $A_1$ and $B_2$ be labelled $C_1$ and $C_2$?
The labels $A$--$G$ attached to connected Dynkin diagrams are of course arbitrary,
the result of historical accidents. In order to avoid repetitions, the four infinite
families $A_\ell, B_\ell, C_ …
20
votes
Why are $S$-arithmetic groups interesting?
Motivation in mathematics is always a tricky question, but I'd call attention to one name you've omitted from your list: Serre. It's definitely worthwhile to look at his paper Cohomologie des groupe …
19
votes
Weyl group actions on 0-weight spaces
This is a reasonable question, and there has been some relevant literature over many decades. But my impression is that no definitive answer has been given, even for the classical types. I've int …