Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 4231

Linear representations of algebras and groups, Lie theory, associative algebras, multilinear algebra.

2 votes

Absolutely irreducible representations of affine group schemes of finite type over a field

The classical viewpoint is captured well in the 1962 book Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Associative Algebras by Curtis and Reiner (Wiley), Corollary 29.15. This of course doesn't direc …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
3 votes

Group cohomology of modular representations for finite groups of Lie type

As Derek Holt comments, cohomology has complications even for fimite general linear groups. Probably you are using the term "reductive" too casually and should replace it by "simple" or perhaps "semis …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

History of the study of Verma modules in terms of Kazhdan Lusztig Theory

It's probably too soon to expect a good historical overview, but for example Steve Kleiman has already written a scholarly article (The development of intersection homology theory) emphasizing the ori …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials in terms of Ext groups

The answer is yes, for fairly elementary reasons, though it's not easy to give a reference. The point is partly that the polynomials are undefined for two elements of the Weyl group not related by t …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
5 votes

Is the tensor product of two infinite dimensional objects in the BGG category $\mathcal{O}$ ...

The answer to the question here is yes. (More generallly, if $M$ and $N$ lie in $\mathcal(O)$ and are both infinite dimensional, then $M \otimes N \notin \mathcal{O}$.) The proof is eaiest to writ …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
8 votes

Weyl's theorem and Representations

Maybe it would clarify matters if I gave a little more background, in community wiki format. The basic idea of this algebraic proof goes back to a short paper by Richard Brauer (1936) in German in Ma …
3 votes
0 answers
172 views

Origin of the standard result on convex hull of weights of an irreducible finite dimensional...

What is the earliest published statement and proof of the well-known result: for a simple Lie algebra over $\mathbb{C}$ or other algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, the convex hull (in the …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
1 vote

Weight spaces of representations of finite dimensional simple Lie algebras

EDIT: I misunderstood at first what your basic question is but now understand it better. One cautionary case comes from older work of Richard Block here, which includes the rank 1 simple Lie algeb …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
0 votes

Cyclic vectors in irreducible representations of simple Lie algebras

In an irreducible representation (finite or infinite dimensional), every nonzero vector is cyclic. This has nothing to do with Lie algebras as such, as it is true over an arbitrary ring. Thus for e …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Distance between Verma modules in certain "strongly" standard filtrations

It's worthwhile to explain something of the background, since Patrick Delorme's preprint never got published in full. It's a 23 page typed double-spaced document with symbols inserted by hand, dis …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
2 votes

Well-definedness of translation functor

Jantzen first defined translation functors around 1977, using a definite finite dimensional module, in 2.10 of his Habilitationsschrift here. Note that at around the same time, Gregg Zuckerman was …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
5 votes

Existence of a weight of a representation in the fundamental Weyl chamber

The problem with your highlighted formulation is that it's wrong as stated, unless for example you require that an "irreducible" representation be finite dimensional or have an integral highest weight …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
4 votes

Problem based representation theory book

The books by Onishchik-Vinberg and by Etingof et al. might fit into this category, too.
4 votes

Indecomposable, non-simple, modules of quantum groups at roots of unity

In the case of the rank 1 simple Lie algebra, your references give a good account of what is known. But in general, it's wise to keep in mind that many of the indecomposable $U_q(\mathfrak{g})$-mod …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
1 vote

Verma modules in category $\mathcal{O}^\mathfrak{p}$

Vit's answer is mostly correct but overlooks the extreme case when $I$ is empty: then $\mathcal{O}^{\mathfrak{p}} = \mathcal{O}$. (At the other extreme one gets all finite dimensional modules.) I …

1
2 3 4 5
24
15 30 50 per page