Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Linear representations of algebras and groups, Lie theory, associative algebras, multilinear algebra.
3
votes
Constituents of induced representation
In the case that $n$ is prime and $H$ is normal in $G$. Your second questions has an affirmative answer. The composition length is $1$, $n$, or $1+d$ where $d\mid (n-1)$, in each case at most $n$. See …
1
vote
A finite group that splits and does not split
I take it Pablo your question can be rephrased as follows. Does there exist an epimorphism $\tau\colon A\ltimes C\to A$ where $A$ acts irreducibly on $C$ and where $\ker(\tau)\ne C$? If this is your q …
2
votes
Reference for restriction of a simple module over a splitting field to a smaller field?
One uses a matrix version of Hilbert's Satz 90 to answer Geoff's comment "If the field $E$ is not this minimal field, it seems less obvious to me how to realise the representation over the subfield ge …
1
vote
Must normalizing field outer automorphisms "divide" the dimension?
The answer to this question is No.
Let $U$ be the natural module for $H=\textrm{SL}(2,5^5)$ and let
$V=U\otimes U^\sigma\otimes\cdots\otimes U^{\sigma^4}$ where $\sigma$ is
field automorphism $\lambda …
3
votes
1
answer
408
views
Must normalizing field outer automorphisms "divide" the dimension?
Imprecise question: To get a normalizing field outer automorphism of
order $r$, must we multiply the dimension by $r$?
Precise hypothesis: Let $p\geqslant 5$ be a prime, let $q$ be a power of $p$ and …
8
votes
Generalization of Schur's Lemma
Schur's lemma has a different generalization when the coefficient field $F$ is not algebraically closed. Then you get $M_{m_1}(D_1)\times\cdots\times M_{m_k}(D_k)$ where $D_i:={\rm Hom}_{FG}(\rho_i,\r …
1
vote
How to detect if a subgroup lands inside an orthogonal group?
This answer may be more general than you need. Let $F$ be a field, and let
$G=\langle g_1,\dots,g_m\rangle$ be a subgroup of ${\rm GL}(n,F)$ which preserves a form, with matrix $J$. Then $g_i J g_i^{\ …
13
votes
Examples of finite groups with "good" bijection(s) between conjugacy classes and irreducible...
This is an interesting question, even though it is not well defined. Call a group "good" if it has a "good" bijection between its conjugacy classes and its irreducible complex representations. I agree …
2
votes
Order of products of elements in symmetric groups
First let me paraphrase the question. Given integers $m,n,k$ each at least 2, set $d:=\max(m,n,k)+2$. Do there exist elements $a,b$ in the symmetric group $S_d$ such that $|a|=m$, $|b|=n$ and $|ab|=k$ …
2
votes
Richness of the subgroup structure of p-groups
The comment by Frieder Ladisch suggests to me that considering exponents may be relevant. Suppose that we generalize Stefan Kohl's function
$f_p(n)$ as follows:
Definition: Fix a prime $p$ and an exp …
6
votes
Are there any known criteria for quadratic mapping from R^n to R^n being surjective?
If $n=2$ the quadratic map $\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}^2$ with $(x_1,x_2)\mapsto (x_1^2-x_2^2,2x_1x_2)$ is surjective. This follows because the map $\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}$ with $z\mapsto z^2$ is surj …
10
votes
When do the sizes of conjugacy classes and squares of degrees of irreps give the same partit...
@Marty Isaacs: There exist non-nilpotent groups whose conjugacy class sizes are all squares. For example, let $G$ be Magma's 93rd group order 540. It has class sizes 1,4,9. Indeed, |G|=15*1+30*4+45*9. …
8
votes
1
answer
468
views
Finite nilpotent orbits: GL(n,q)-conjugacy classes and a partial order on partitions
I have a question regarding a partial order $<$
on the set ${\rm Part}(n)$ of partitions of $n$.
Given $\lambda=(\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\ldots)\in{\rm Part}(n)$ with
$\sum_{i\geq1} \lambda_i=n$ and $\lam …