Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 1946

Theories of arithmetic in first-order logic, such as Peano arithmetic, second-order arithmetic, Heyting arithmetic, and their subsystems and extensions. Models of Peano arithmetic.

2 votes
Accepted

To which arithmetic\set theory this theory is bi-interpretable?

Your theory is true in the one-element universe $\{a\}$ in which $a<a$ is true and $a\in a$ is false. The order transitivity holds trivially in this case; the finiteness axiom holds vacuously; and the …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
3 votes

The Dirichlet principle and arithmetical induction

The theory PA fully proves the pigeon-hole principle, which how I like to refer to your principle, the claim that there is no injection from the predecessors of $n$ to those of $n-1$. (This implies of …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Can PA define functions related to higher theories?

Yes, this function is obviously definable in PA and PA proves it is total. You are defining the tower of theories by recursion, which PA can do, and taking the Rosser sentence of each theory, which PA …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
4 votes

Heuristic interpretations of the PA-unprovability of Goodstein's Theorem

To my way of thinking, the arguments you mention seem not to distinguish sufficiently between the content of Goodstein's theorem as a universal claim $\forall p$ and Goodstein's theorem as a collectio …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
11 votes
Accepted

Which part(s) of this proof of Goodstein's Theorem are not expressible in Peano arithmetic?

Because your argument involves arithmetical classes at several points, as you noticed, it is not directly expressible in the first-order language of $\newcommand\PA{\text{PA}}\PA$, although as Noah me …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
39 votes
Accepted

What is known about the theory of natural numbers with only 0, successor and max?

This theory is equivalent to the theory of a discrete linear order with a least element and no largest element, that is, the theory of $\langle\mathbb{N},<\rangle$. From max we can define the order an …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
10 votes
Accepted

Why include $0$ and $1$ in the signature of Presburger arithmetic?

It is the same in Peano arithmetic, where the standard language is $\{+,\cdot,0,1,<\}$ for the standard model $\langle\mathbb{N},+,\cdot,0,1,<\rangle$, even though $0$, $1$, and $<$ are definable from …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
4 votes

Is this theory synonymous with PA?

Let me give half an answer. Specifically, we can interpret your theory in PA via the Ackermann encoding. Namely, in any model of PA, define $m\in x$ if and only if the $m$th bit of $x$ is $1$. This fu …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
2 votes

Is diamond consistent with 2nd order PA?

In the case of $\text{GBC}^-$, the answer is no, $\Diamond$ is not provable from the assumption that all reals are constructible. It is consistent with $\text{GBC}^-$ and even $\text{KM}^-$ that $\Dia …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
16 votes

Con(PA) via non-well-foundedness?

This is a completely standard perspective in work on models-of-PA, a view that informs dozens of arguments. That is simply the nature of nonstandard models, that things they think are well founded are …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
14 votes
Accepted

Extensions of $PA+\neg Con(PA)$ with large consistency strength

Let $T$ be the theory PA + ¬Con(PA), plus the axiom asserting that there is no proof of a contradiction in ZFC (or ZFC+LC etc.) of size below $k$, where $k$ is the smallest such that $\newcommand\PA{\ …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
8 votes

Can set theory be interpreted in infinite arithmetic?

Without considering your system of arithmetic too closely, let me mention that ZFC is interpretable in Peano arithmetic, if one augments PA with the assertion that ZFC is consistent. That is, ZFC is i …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

The additive structure of clusters of nonstandard models of arithmetic

The answer is yes. The additive cluster structure knows the additive structure of the original model up to isomorphism. Theorem. The additive structure of any countable nonstandard model $M$ of $\newc …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
7 votes

The additive structure of clusters of nonstandard models of arithmetic

If you intend literally to recover the addition operation of the given model $M$, then the answer is negative. For every nonstandard model of arithmetic $M$ there is another model $M'$ having exactly …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
13 votes
Accepted

Analysis I, simpler proof of Tao's construction of the integers

In fact one doesn't need the replacement axiom at all in order to implement this set-theoretic construction of the integers. The entire construction can be undertaken in Zermelo set theory, which lack …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar

15 30 50 per page