Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 1946

Questions about abstract measure and Lebesgue integral theory. Also concerns such properties as measurability of maps and sets.

92 votes
3 answers
14k views

Is every sigma-algebra the Borel algebra of a topology?

This question arises from the excellent question posed on math.SE by Salvo Tringali, namely, Correspondence between Borel algebras and topology. Since the question was not answered there after some ti …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
45 votes
Accepted

Measurability and Axiom of choice

The bold statement is not true in the generality in which you state it. Nevertheless, something very like it is true, if one adopts the perspective and philosophy of large cardinal set theory and rest …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
35 votes

What's the use of a complete measure?

Since the existence of non-measurable sets is often seen as undesirable, we naturally want to have as many measurable sets as possible. With Lebesgue measure on the reals, for example, if we were to s …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
28 votes
Accepted

Is the sum of 2 Lebesgue measurable sets measurable?

Evidently, there are measure zero sets with a non measurable sum. The article begins as follows: Krzysztof Ciesielski, Hajrudin Fejzi´c, Chris Freiling, Measure zero sets with …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
28 votes

Non-Borel sets without axiom of choice

If you assume the countable axiom of choice, then most sets of reals are not Borel. Under AC, what you get is that there are continuum many Borel sets, that is, $2^{\aleph_0}$ many, but $2^{2^{\aleph_ …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
27 votes
Accepted

Writing a function on $\mathbb{R}$ as a sum of two injections

The answer is yes. Every function on the reals is the sum of two injective functions, and this can be done in a highly effective manner, constructing the two functions $g,h$ from $f$ without any need …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
26 votes
4 answers
2k views

Does every set of reals contain a measure-zero set of the same cardinality? Does it contain ...

This question arises from an issue in my post on Ashutosh's excellent question on Restrictions of the null/meager ideal. Question 1. Does every set of reals contain a measure-zero subset of the same …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
25 votes

Axiom of choice and non-measurable set

No, the existence of a non-Lebesgue measurable set does not imply the axiom of choice. If ZF is consistent, then set-theorists can construct models of ZF having a non-Lebesgue measurable set, but stil …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
25 votes

Do sets with positive Lebesgue measure have same cardinality as R?

The answer to the question is that it is independent of ZFC, if one is speaking of outer measure. The right context for the question and its answer is the very active research area known as Cardinal …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
23 votes
Accepted

Within ZFC, is $2^{\aleph_0}<2^{\aleph_1}$ provable/independent?

The assertion that $2^{\aleph_0}=2^{\aleph_1}$ is known as Luzin's hypothesis, and was presented by Luzin as an alternative to Cantor's continuum hypothesis. This is now known to be independent of ZFC …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
18 votes
Accepted

Existence of probability measure defined on all subsets

The existence of such a measure is equiconsistent to the existence of a measurable cardinal, one of the large cardinal notions, and if ZFC is consistent, cannot be proved in ZFC. (See the notion of re …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
18 votes
Accepted

Probabilities independent of ZFC?

There are several issues. On the one hand, any set can be made countable by forcing, and this process will certainly affect the measure of the set, if it did not have measure zero in the ground mode …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
16 votes
Accepted

Is a subset that contains no positive measurable subsets contained in a null measurable set?

You are asking whether every set with inner measure $0$ has measure $0$ with respect to the completion measure. The Lebesgue measure, for example, does not have this property, since the usual Vitali s …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
15 votes

Sets with positive Lebesgue measure boundary

Let $D_0,D_1,\ldots$ enumerate a sequence of disjoint intervals in the unit interval with $\bigcup_n D_n$ open dense and having measure less than $1$. For example, place a very tiny interval around ea …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

How to prove that the Lebesgue $\sigma$-Algebra is not countably generated?

Let me mount the kind of cardinality argument to which you allude. You had asked for a proof that the $\sigma$-algebra of Lebesgue measurable sets is not countably generated. But in fact, a much stron …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar

1
2 3 4 5
15 30 50 per page