Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Questions about abstract measure and Lebesgue integral theory. Also concerns such properties as measurability of maps and sets.
92
votes
3
answers
14k
views
Is every sigma-algebra the Borel algebra of a topology?
This question arises from the excellent question posed on math.SE
by Salvo Tringali, namely, Correspondence
between Borel algebras and topology.
Since the question was not answered there after some ti …
45
votes
Accepted
Measurability and Axiom of choice
The bold statement is not true in the generality in which you
state it. Nevertheless, something very like it is true, if one
adopts the perspective and philosophy of large cardinal set theory
and rest …
35
votes
What's the use of a complete measure?
Since the existence of non-measurable sets is often seen as undesirable, we naturally want to have as many measurable sets as possible. With Lebesgue measure on the reals, for example, if we were to s …
28
votes
Accepted
Is the sum of 2 Lebesgue measurable sets measurable?
Evidently, there are measure zero sets with a non measurable sum. The article begins as follows:
Krzysztof Ciesielski,
Hajrudin Fejzi´c, Chris Freiling,
Measure zero sets with …
28
votes
Non-Borel sets without axiom of choice
If you assume the countable axiom of choice, then most sets
of reals are not Borel. Under AC, what you get is that
there are continuum many Borel sets, that is,
$2^{\aleph_0}$ many, but $2^{2^{\aleph_ …
27
votes
Accepted
Writing a function on $\mathbb{R}$ as a sum of two injections
The answer is yes. Every function on the reals is the sum of two injective functions, and this can be done in a highly effective manner, constructing the two functions $g,h$ from $f$ without any need …
26
votes
4
answers
2k
views
Does every set of reals contain a measure-zero set of the same cardinality? Does it contain ...
This question arises from an issue in my post on Ashutosh's excellent question on Restrictions of the null/meager ideal.
Question 1. Does every set of reals contain a measure-zero subset
of the same …
25
votes
Axiom of choice and non-measurable set
No, the existence of a non-Lebesgue measurable set does not imply the axiom of choice. If ZF is consistent, then set-theorists can construct models of ZF having a non-Lebesgue measurable set, but stil …
25
votes
Do sets with positive Lebesgue measure have same cardinality as R?
The answer to the question is that it is independent of ZFC, if one is speaking of outer measure.
The right context for the question and its answer is the very active research area known as Cardinal …
23
votes
Accepted
Within ZFC, is $2^{\aleph_0}<2^{\aleph_1}$ provable/independent?
The assertion that $2^{\aleph_0}=2^{\aleph_1}$ is known as Luzin's hypothesis, and was presented by Luzin as an alternative to Cantor's continuum hypothesis.
This is now known to be independent of ZFC …
18
votes
Accepted
Existence of probability measure defined on all subsets
The existence of such a measure is equiconsistent to the existence of a measurable cardinal, one of the large cardinal notions, and if ZFC is consistent, cannot be proved in ZFC. (See the notion of re …
18
votes
Accepted
Probabilities independent of ZFC?
There are several issues.
On the one hand, any set can be made countable by forcing, and this process will certainly affect the measure of the set, if it did not have measure zero in the ground mode …
16
votes
Accepted
Is a subset that contains no positive measurable subsets contained in a null measurable set?
You are asking whether every set with inner measure $0$ has measure $0$ with respect to the completion measure. The Lebesgue measure, for example, does not have this property, since the usual Vitali s …
15
votes
Sets with positive Lebesgue measure boundary
Let $D_0,D_1,\ldots$ enumerate a sequence of disjoint intervals in the unit interval with $\bigcup_n D_n$ open dense and having measure less than $1$. For example, place a very tiny interval around ea …
15
votes
Accepted
How to prove that the Lebesgue $\sigma$-Algebra is not countably generated?
Let me mount the kind of cardinality argument to which you allude.
You had asked for a proof that the $\sigma$-algebra of Lebesgue measurable sets is not countably generated. But in fact, a much stron …