Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Hamiltonian systems, symplectic flows, classical integrable systems
1
vote
Blowup and Delzant Polytope
This is Homework 22 in Ana Cannas da Silva's Lectures on Symplectic Geometry (2001). It's also described in her articles Symplectic toric manifolds (2003, p.124) and Symplectic Geometry (2006, p.172). …
1
vote
Accepted
Marsden–Weinstein: example of not proper action
(Comment $\to$ answer as requested.)
Let $G=\mathbf R$ act on the 2-torus $Z=\mathrm U(1)\times\mathrm U(1)$ by $g(z_1,z_2)=(e^{ig}z_1, e^{i\pi g}z_2)$. Lift the action to $T^*Z$ and use any $G$-invar …
2
votes
Accepted
Kostant-Kirillov form versus Fubini-Study form on Plucker embedding
The answer is yes, due to formal properties of moment maps (that depend on almost no details of your situation). Namely, suppose $K$ acts transitively on any symplectic manifold $(X,\omega_X)$, with e …
6
votes
Is every symplectic manifold a Hamiltonian reduction of a cotangent bundle?
That reminds me of a paper that I believe should answer your question: $\mathbf R^{2n}$ is a universal symplectic manifold for reduction (available here):
The authors show that if a manifold $Q$ i …
5
votes
Accepted
How to find Darboux coordinates?
There is a large literature on this. I would recommend the papers
MR0379752 Vergne, Michèle La structure de Poisson sur l'algèbre symétrique d'une algèbre de Lie nilpotente. Bull. Soc. Math. France …
6
votes
Accepted
Level sets of Hamiltonians of S^1 actions
Michael F. Atiyah, Convexity and commuting Hamiltonians (1982), Lemma 2.3.
Dusa McDuff and Dietmar Salamon, Introduction to symplectic topology (2nd ed., 1998), Lemmas 5.51 and 5.54.
Michèle Audin, …
5
votes
Deformation of Lagrangian manifolds
You already know that the pair $(M,L)$ of a symplectic manifold and a Lagrangian submanifold is locally isomorphic to $(T^*L, L)$. This is the beginning of Corollary 6.2 of Weinstein, who continues: " …
7
votes
symplectic structure of tangent bundle of $\mathbb{S}^{n-1}$
$
\def\C{{\mathbf C}}
\def\d{\delta}
\def\e{{\mathbf e}}
\def\r{{\mathbf r}}
\def\u{{\mathbf u}}
\def\x{{\mathbf x}}
\def\y{{\mathbf y}}
\def\z{{\mathbf z}}
\def\<{\langle}
\def\>{\rangle}
$
If I unde …
7
votes
Special Cases of Duistermaat-Heckman Formula
Nice examples are worked out in Audin (2004, §VI.3.d), Arvanitoyeorgos (1999)(pdf), McDuff-Salamon (1998, §5.6). It’s not true that $\omega$ is rarely explicit: e.g. on all coadjoint orbits (including …
19
votes
Accepted
Symplectic formulation of statistical physics
You want to read Chapter IV "Statistical Mechanics" in Structure of Dynamical Systems (1970 French original available here) by J.-M. Souriau, one of the pioneers of symplectic mechanics.
Given a symp …
4
votes
Accepted
When do commuting Hamiltonian flows have commuting generators?
This is not so much an answer as a suggestion to change the question. When $(P,\Omega)$ is prequantizable, i.e. there exists over $P$ a hermitian line bundle with connection $(L,\nabla)$ having curva …
3
votes
Accepted
Symplectic submanifolds of cotangent bundles of Lie groups
The preimage of a coadjoint orbit under a moment map is, under a mild transversality assumption, a coisotropic submanifold; so its null foliation $\smash{\ker(\omega_{|\Phi^{-1}(\mathcal O)})}$ is not …
2
votes
How are Poisson brackets and the variational principle related?
The direct connection between Poisson bracket and non-commutativity is pretty clear, at least if you agree that the (later introduced) Lie bracket $[X,Y]$ of vector fields measures the non-commutativi …
10
votes
Information from Moment Polytopes
The difference $\frac12\dim(X)-\dim(T)$ is known as the complexity of the $T$-space (assumed effective), so that's the keyword you want to use. Such results as I've heard of are mainly for complexity …
4
votes
How is the Euler-Lagrange equation derived without local coordinates?
I don’t think your characterization of the vector field is quite correct; I would recommend Cartan (1922, §§184-185), Godbillon (1969, Proposition XI.3.7), or Souriau (1970, Theorem 7.29). Or this ans …