Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 184

Topology of cell complexes and manifolds, classification of manifolds (e.g. smoothing, surgery), low dimensional topology (e.g. knot theory, invariants of 4-manifolds), embedding theory, combinatorial and PL topology, geometric group theory, infinite dimensional topology (e.g. Hilbert cube manifolds, theory of retracts).

18 votes

Does $M^o=N^o$ imply that $\partial M = \partial N$?

(Marc Kegel posted his answer just before I posted this. I will leave it because perhaps this helps elaborate some of the points) No, this is not true in general. Here is an example of what can ha …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
40 votes
Accepted

Classifiying sphere eversions

Answer Summary The fundamental group of the space of immersions of $S^2$ into $\mathbb{R}^3$ is $$ \pi_1 Im(S^2, \mathbb{R}^3) \cong \mathbb{Z}/2 \times \mathbb{Z}$$ This means that there are infini …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
27 votes
2 answers
2k views

Are the mapping class groups of manifolds finitely presentable?

The mapping class group of a manifold is the group $\pi_0 Diff(M)$ of components of the diffeomorphism group. There are several variations: oriented manifolds and orientation preserving diffeomorphism …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
6 votes

TQFT and Mapping Class Groups

The following paper answers your question precisely, I think: arxiv:1408.0668 Specifically Theorem 1.3 (which is elaborated on in Section 4) describes precisely what additional data you must specify …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
9 votes
Accepted

Spin TQFT's in dimensions (1+1)

This is covered in Moore and Segal "D-branes and K-theory in 2D topological field theory". In particular on around page 16 there is a characterization analogous to "1+1 TQFTs = Commutative Frobenius a …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
6 votes

Reference request: gluing manifolds along pieces of boundary

This was a bit too long for a comment, so I am posting it as an answer. You are sort of asking two things: How to turn your manifolds M and S into an appropriate manifold with corners together with …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
547 views

Is the Action of the mapping class group transitive on embedded arcs?

Let S be a surface of genus g with some parked points (n of them). Assume $n \geq 2$ and fix two of the marked points. Consider the set of embedded arcs going between these two special points. The gro …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
23 votes
0 answers
684 views

Do most manifolds have symmetries? or not?

Let us say that a (closed, connected) manifold has a symmetry if it admits a non-trivial action by a finite group. Note that I am not asking the action to be free. So for example rotating the 2-sphere …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
28 votes
Accepted

Nilpotence of the stable Hopf map via framed cobordism

Answer Summary Let $\eta$ be the framed 1-manifold which is the Lie group framing on the circle and let $\nu$ be the Lie group framing on $S^3 = Spin(3)$. I am probably going to conflate these framed …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
10 votes
2 answers
647 views

Homotopy equivalent smooth 4-manifolds which are not stably diffeomorphic?

Recall that two 4-manifolds $M$ and $N$ are stably diffeomorphic if there exist $m,n$ such that $$M \#_n (S^2 \times S^2) \cong N \#_n (S^2 \times S^2).$$ That is, they become diffeomorphic after taki …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
17 votes
Accepted

How aggressive is the fibrant replacement of $\mathrm{Bord}_n$?

The completeness condition is not really about making things invertible which weren't already. It is about where the information about invertible morphisms is stored. We can already see this with $(\i …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar