Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Enriched categories, topoi, abelian categories, monoidal categories, homological algebra.
40
votes
What are the benefits of viewing a sheaf from the "espace étalé" perspective?
To me the obvious answer involves sheafification of a presheaf. If you look at the construction of the associated sheaf to a presheaf in, say, Hartshorne it goes through the étalé space construction …
29
votes
3
answers
4k
views
Lawvere theories versus classical universal algebra
A Lawvere theory is a small category with finite products such that every object is isomorphic to a finite product of copies of a distinguished object x. A model of the theory in a category with finit …
25
votes
Accepted
How many category structures are possible on two sets?
The problem of counting semigroups and monoids of order $n$ up to isomorphism and anti-isomorphism (i.e., contravariant equvialence) is a very classical problem whose answer is conjectured but nobody …
22
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Toposes (topoi) as classifying toposes of groupoids
A famous theorem of Joyal and Tierney says that each Grothendieck topos is equivalent to the classifying topos of a localic groupoid. I believe that Butz and Moerdijk have shown that if the topos has …
19
votes
Accepted
Does there exist an ordering-functor?
Conceptual answer.
There can be no such functor. Let $C$ be any concrete category of finite sets and mappings such that the only automorphisms in $C$ are trivial. I claim there is no underlying set …
18
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Is there a topos theoretic interpretation/proof of Quillen's Theorem A?
I think the title says it all. Quillen's Theorem A says that a functor $F\colon C\to D$ induces a homotopy equivalence of classifying spaces if each fiber category $F/d$ with $d$ an object of $D$ is …
16
votes
What information is lost in $X \to \mathrm{Sh}(X)$?
Following Martin's suggestion, I will turn my comment into an answer.
If $T$ is an Grothendieck topos, then the subobjects of the terminal object form a frame. If $X_T$ is the corresponding locale, …
12
votes
Accepted
Is a retract of a free object free?
A retract of a finitely generated free monoid is free even though submonoids need not be free. I don't know about the infinitely generated case.
Edit: infinitely generated seems ok. The fg case I sa …
11
votes
Accepted
Characterizing Groupoids via Quotients?
I believe the following is an example of a category whose leanification is discrete but which is not a groupoid. It should be possible to simplify it. There may be details to work out. Let $B$ be t …
11
votes
Characterizing specific "concrete" mathematical objects by abstract general properties
The Stone-Cech compactification. Neither, Stone nor Cech was thinking about category theory at the time (since it didn't exist), but of course the Stone-Cech compactification is a left adjoint to the …
10
votes
1
answer
269
views
A flatness result of Fiedorwicz for amalgamated free products of monoids in connection with ...
In Lemma 5.2(a) of Z. Fiedorowicz, Classifying Spaces of Topological Monoids and Categories American Journal of Mathematics Vol. 106, No. 2 (Apr., 1984), pp. 301-350 the author proves the following.
…
10
votes
Free product of categories
Probably you want to look at pushouts of categories along a common set of objects. For example, the free product of monoids is the pushout along the inclusion of the identity. Such things and their wo …
9
votes
Characterizing specific "concrete" mathematical objects by abstract general properties
Free groups. If I am not mistaken, they were first introduced by Dyck via the reduced words description. The modern universal property definition only came about later.
9
votes
Characterization of the transfer map in group theory
Here is another answer. It is in fact equivalent to all the previous answers but is more categorical. Let $X$ be a finite transitive $G$-set and let $\mathcal G=G\ltimes X$ be the corresponding Groth …
8
votes
Accepted
Free groupoid and homotopy equivalence
No. There is a monoid with trivial group image whose classifying space is a sphere. See Is there a (discrete) monoid M injecting into its group completion G for which BM is not homotopy equivalent to …