Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
A topos is a category that behaves very much like the category of sets and possesses a good notion of localization. Related to topos are: sheaves, presheaves, descent, stacks, localization,...
3
votes
monics in topoi
This is half of Corollary 2.4.3 in [Sketches of an elephant, Part A]. Here is (a paraphrase of) the proof:
Let $\mathcal{E}$ be an elementary topos, let $f : A \rightarrowtail B$ be a monomorphism …
9
votes
Accepted
What properties do "large topoi" share with actual topoi?
By definition, a $\mathbf{U}$-pretopos is a category $\mathcal{C}$ that satisfies Giraud's axioms except for the existence of topological generators, i.e.
$\mathcal{C}$ has finite limits,
$\mathcal{ …
5
votes
Accepted
When does the direct image functor nicely push past the power/exists functor?
Since every power object is an internal Heyting algebra, and $f_*$ preserves the structure of internal Heyting algebras, there are trivial examples of such natural transformations corresponding to the …
2
votes
Accepted
question of topos and site
Yes: every morphism of Grothendieck toposes arises as a morphism of sites. (However, the site may depend on the morphism.) This is Corollary C2.3.10 in Johnstone's Sketches of an elephant. The argumen …
6
votes
When do two topoi have the same cohomology of constant sheaves
There is a notion of the étale homotopy type of a (Grothendieck) topos, going back to Artin and Mazur (I think).
However, in classic "French" fashion they turned a theorem (in one setting) into a defi …
13
votes
Accepted
Does this kind of endofunctor ever have an initial algebra?
By Lambek's theorem, any initial algebra for an endofunctor $F$ has the property that its structural morphism $\alpha : F A \to A$ is an isomorphism. So we seek an object $A$ such that $P P A = \Omega …
7
votes
Large "internal" categories and "finite" products
I think for your specific problem it suffices to add a compatibility condition between the locally internal category $\mathcal{C}$ and the NNO.
First, let me describe the case where $\mathcal{C}$ is e …
6
votes
Barr's theorem and constructivity?
In every Grothendieck topos, the following sequent is valid for the natural numbers object $N$,
$$x : N \vdash \bigvee_{n : \mathbb{N}} x = s^n (z)$$
where $\mathbb{N}$ is the set of natural numbers, …
2
votes
Accepted
Cocontinuous functor out of the terminal category
The functor $i$ does not have the cover lifting property in general. If it did, then every epimorphism $X \to 1$ in $\mathbf{Sh}(\mathcal{C}, \tau)$ would be an isomorphism, or equivalently, every $\t …
8
votes
Accepted
Are topoi and etale geometric morphisms locally small?
There is only a set of isomorphism classes of étale geometric morphisms between any two Grothendieck toposes. In fact, the same is true for essential geometric morphisms.
Recall that Grothendieck top …
20
votes
Accepted
Are there non-categorical notions in topos theory?
There is a Grothendieck topos $\textbf{Set}[\mathbb{O}]$ with the following universal property: for all Grothendieck toposes $\mathcal{E}$, the category $\textbf{Geom}(\mathcal{E}, \textbf{Set}[\mathb …
12
votes
Every Grothendieck topos can be built from localic topoi
They are (it is?) the same theorem, but emphasising different aspects.
We can exploit the object classifier to get from the formulation in terms of (pseudo)colimits to the "elementary" formulation in …
12
votes
Localic or topos-theoretic definition of $\operatorname{Spec}$
This is ultimately the same construction as the one Simon Henry describes, but you might like the different perspective.
Definition.
Let $A$ be a commutative rig and let $L$ be a distributive lattice. …
6
votes
0
answers
83
views
Covering categories with posets
Let $C$ be a small (1-)category.
There is always a poset $D$ and a functor $p : D \to C$ such that:
$p$ is surjective on objects, i.e. for every $c$ in $C$ there is a $d$ in $D$ such that $p (d) = c$ …
2
votes
A confusion about covering flatness
Your proof is correct and your "counterexample" is wrong.
Here's how I prefer to think of the definition of "covering-flat": a diagram $F : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}$ is covering-flat if and only …