Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
For questions about sheaves on a topological space.
6
votes
Categories in which isomorphism of stalks does not imply isomorphism of sheaves
Here is a reformulation/generalisation of G. Stefanich's counterexample, showing that sheaf-locality can fail very dramatically once we leave the realm of locally finitely presentable categories.
More …
13
votes
2
answers
635
views
Categories in which isomorphism of stalks does not imply isomorphism of sheaves
Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a locally small category with colimits of small filtered diagrams.
For the purposes of this question, an $\mathcal{A}$-presheaf on a topological space $X$ is a functor $\Omega (X) …
29
votes
3
answers
3k
views
Is there a good general definition of "sheaves with values in a category"?
Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a category.
There is a common definition of "sheaves with values in $\mathcal{A}$", which is what one obtains by taking the Grothendieck-style definition of "sheaf of sets" (i.e. …
8
votes
not quite the sheaf condition
It sounds to me you seek a solution to the following problem:
Given a suitable subcategory of $\textbf{Set}$, find a Grothendieck topology on $\textbf{Set}$ so that sheaves on $\textbf{Set}$ are equi …
7
votes
Accepted
Subobject classifier for sheaves on large sites with WISC
To answer your question directly, WISC does not imply the existence of subobject classifiers.
Notice that when there are only trivial covers, WISC is trivially satisfied, so it suffices to find a cate …
8
votes
Accepted
Subsheaves of Spec K, K a field
There is no hope for this in any subcanonical topology coarser than the fppf topology, or more generally, any subcanonical topology in which morphisms $\operatorname{Spec} C \to \operatorname{Spec} K$ …
1
vote
Assumptions on the category C for sheafification of C-valued presheaves
My position is that the definition of $\mathcal{C}$-valued sheaves for completely general categories $\mathcal{C}$ is not yet a settled matter.
For locally finitely presentable categories $\mathcal{C} …
10
votes
Accepted
Direct and inverse image terminology
There is a precise, almost literal, sense in which $f^* : \textbf{Sh} (Y) \to \textbf{Sh} (X)$ generalises the inverse image as defined in elementary set theory.
Observe that open subspaces $V \subset …
22
votes
Sheaf-theoretic approach to forcing
I think the language of classifying toposes is helpful in understanding this view of forcing.
Let $P$ be a poset.
The set theorists have the intuition that forcing over $P$ adjoins a generic filter of …
14
votes
Accepted
The real numbers object in Sh(Top)
Following a suggestion of Thomas Holder, we can close the gap as follows:
For each object $Y$ in $\mathbf{T}$, there is a pseudonatural local geometric morphism $\mathbf{Sh}(\mathbf{T}_{/ Y}) \to \m …
2
votes
Accepted
Cocontinuous functor out of the terminal category
The functor $i$ does not have the cover lifting property in general. If it did, then every epimorphism $X \to 1$ in $\mathbf{Sh}(\mathcal{C}, \tau)$ would be an isomorphism, or equivalently, every $\t …