Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
8
votes
Accepted
concentration inequality for averages of dependent random variables
Without further assumptions you can't do better than the union bound (which should be $n e^{-\epsilon^2}$ as you've written things). If $X_i$ are identically distributed and the events $(|X_i| > \eps …
3
votes
Does log-concave approximable distribution satisfy transportation-cost inequality?
Let's try again.
The theorem of Otto and Villani implies that every distribution $\nu$ which is log-concave in the sense you define satisfies a transportation-cost inequality.
There are many distrib …
2
votes
Levy's isoperimetric inequality for sphere
A different symmetrization-based proof is given in this review article by Schechtman (pp. 7-8); see the previous page for references.
2
votes
General distributions with the "transportation-cost inequality" property to piece log-concav...
(A) Nathael Gozlan proved that a distribution $\mu$ satisfies a $T_2$ inequality if and only if all finite tensor products of $\mu$ satisfy a subgaussian concentration property.
(B) and (B') For fini …
0
votes
Do subgaussian variables obey the slightly-stronger-than-Chernoff tail bound?
It depends on exactly what you mean by "of the form ($*$)". As Davide points out (and as you certainly know if you've been reading Boucheron, Lugosi, and Massart), for centered subgaussian random var …