Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with matrix-analysis
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 102946
The study of the properties of real and complex matrices that are more close to analysis and operator theory. For instance: the properties of positive definite matrices, matrix inequalities, perturbation analysis, matrix functions, inequalities between eigenvectors and singular values, majorization.
7
votes
Accepted
On approximate simultaneous diagonalization
The answer is no in general.
For a $2\times 2$-counterexample, let $A = 0$, let $B$ be the diagonal matrix with diagonal entries $1$ and $0$ (i.e. $B$ is the projection onto the first component), cho …
- 12.6k
4
votes
Accepted
A matrix monotonicity question
The answer is no, in general. Here is a counterexample:
Let
\begin{align*}
X =
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 \\
0 & 0
\end{pmatrix},
\quad \text{and} \quad
A =
\begin{ …
- 12.6k
58
votes
Accepted
Is this proof of Perron's theorem correct, and if so is it original?
(1) Correctness: I read all arguments in detail and couldn't find anything wrong with them. Of course, this doesn't mean too much...
(2) Orginality: I think in a topic which has such an extensive his …
- 12.6k