Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
3 votes
1 answer
135 views

$\Pi^0_1$ sentences modulo "schematic entailment"

Let $\mathfrak{P}$ be the preorder of $\Delta^0_0$ (= only bounded quantifiers) formulas with one free variable in the language of arithmetic, under the relation $\alpha(x)\le\beta(x)$ iff there is a ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
7 votes
4 answers
574 views

A conservative extension of Peano Arithmetic

Ulrich Kohlenbach makes the following intriguing comment here: "In the 70s S. Feferman introduced a mathematically strong system S=restricted(PA^omega)+QF-AC+mu for classical mathematics (and in ...
Mikhail Katz's user avatar
  • 16.6k
5 votes
2 answers
433 views

Models of second-order arithmetic closed under relative constructibility

I know little to nothing about second-order arithmetic and its subsystems. However, I would like to understand when a model of (a subsystem of) second-order arithmetic ($\mathsf{Z}_2$) is downward ...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,286
4 votes
1 answer
439 views

Alternative proof of Tennenbaum's theorem

The standard proof of Tennenbaums's theorem uses the existence of recursively enumerable inseparable sets and is presented e.g. in Kaye [1, 2], Smith [3]. In the following, $\mathcal{M}$ will always ...
Léreau's user avatar
  • 211
4 votes
1 answer
377 views

Does ACA prove categoricity of the reals?

$\def\f#1{\text{#1}}$Does $\f{ACA}$ prove that any two internally complete ordered fields are isomorphic? Here internal completeness is expressed roughly as "every sequence of reals with an upper ...
user21820's user avatar
  • 2,912
3 votes
0 answers
146 views

Does Robinson arithmetic interpret a Kripke model of the double negation translation of $\mathsf{I}\Delta_0 + \mathrm{Exp}$?

It is a well-known fact that while while Robinson arithmetic can interpret surprisingly strong theories, it cannot interpret $\mathsf{I}\Delta_0 + \mathrm{Exp}$, i.e., Peano arithmetic with induction ...
James E Hanson's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
431 views

How can I prove that primitive recursion “preserves” representability in Peano Arithmetic?

I'm working on my thesis about Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems, and at some point I need to prove that the $\textsf{PA}$ system is able to represent all the recursive functions. By recursive function ...
Ranopano's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
542 views

Looking for “Set theory for a small universe” by Ketonen

In the paper Partition theorems for systems of finite subsets of integers, Pudlák and Rödl show a Ramsey-type result. The main feature of this result is that the sizes of sets in such systems are not ...
Pedro Sánchez Terraf's user avatar
7 votes
2 answers
708 views

On a theorem of Zhang Jinwen about models of arithmetic

In the paper ''A Nonstandard Model of Arithmetic Constructed by means of Forcing Method'', Zhang Jinwen states the following in his abstract: The first nonstandard model of arithmetic was given by ...
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
287 views

Is the two variable fragment of arithmetic, i.e., theory of ($\mathbb{N}, + ,\times$), decidable?

Any references would be appreciated. Most places only address different vocabularies (e.g. a survey of arithmetical definability by Bes).
Thinniyam Srinivasan Ramanatha's user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
314 views

Semantic reflection

Let $\ulcorner \cdot \urcorner$ be a fixed encoding of formulas by numbers, e.g. let $\ulcorner \varphi \urcorner$ denote the Godel number of $\varphi$. Let $T$ be a first-order arithmetic theory, e....
Kaveh's user avatar
  • 5,502
9 votes
1 answer
1k views

Does Nelson try to prove PA inconsistent directly?

Edward Nelson is known for his serious attempts to show that Peano axioms, and sometimes even weaker theories, are inconsistent. I wasn't able to find Nelson's papers anywhere, so I wanted to ask a ...
Wojowu's user avatar
  • 28.2k
7 votes
1 answer
447 views

The definition of < in Robinson's Q

I recently had to explain how the basic axioms in Simpson's Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic were interpretable in Robinson's Q. Most of the axioms are actually the same, except that Simpson ...
François G. Dorais's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
705 views

Does the totality of Ackermann's function prove the consistency of $\Sigma_1$-induction?

It is well known that Ackermann's function is not primitive recursive. Therefore, the theories of primitive recursive arithmetic (PRA) and of $\Sigma_1$-induction ($I\Sigma_1$) cannot prove the ...
alexod's user avatar
  • 777
7 votes
4 answers
912 views

Reference Request: Non-Standard Models of PA

I am attempting to write an expository paper on non-standard models of PA that is accesible to students taking an introductory graduate course in mathematical logic (covering Godel's incompleteness ...
Samuel Reid's user avatar
  • 1,441
4 votes
1 answer
876 views

Derivability conditions for Robinson arithmetic

Two pieces of hearsay I have encountered about Robinson's Q: Q fails to satisfy the Löb derivability conditions; Pudlák criticised the Löb derivability conditions and suggested rival, weaker ...
Charles Stewart's user avatar
68 votes
4 answers
12k views

Nelson's program to show inconsistency of ZF

At the end of the paper Division by three by Peter G. Doyle and John H. Conway, the authors say: Not that we believe there really are any such things as infinite sets, or that the Zermelo-Fraenkel ...
Andreas Thom's user avatar
  • 25.5k
12 votes
1 answer
1k views

How to locate the paper that established Robinson Arithmetic?

If I'm not mistaken, it was in his seminal paper “An Essentially Undecidable Axiom System”, published in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (1950), 1952:729–730, where R.M. ...
Jose Brox's user avatar
  • 2,992