Skip to main content

Questions tagged [set-theory]

forcing, large cardinals, descriptive set theory, infinite combinatorics, cardinal characteristics, forcing axioms, ultrapowers, measures, reflection, pcf theory, models of set theory, axioms of set theory, independence, axiom of choice, continuum hypothesis, determinacy, Borel equivalence relations, Boolean-valued models, embeddings, orders, relations, transfinite recursion, set theory as a foundation of mathematics, the philosophy of set theory.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
-1 votes
2 answers
263 views

Selection problem in a collection of non-empty sets

Is there a set $X\neq\emptyset$ and a collection ${\cal F}\subseteq {\cal P}(X)\setminus\{\emptyset\}$ of non-empty subsets of $X$ with the following properties? $a\in {\cal F} \implies |a|\geq 2$, $...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
827 views

Is it possible to derive the rules of set theory as transfers from the pure finite set world, and can we extend this further?

Informally the idea of this question is about whether the rules of set theory can be derived as a transfer of some rules from the hereditarily finite set realm, and whether this transfer principle ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
573 views

is the existence of an inaccessible cardinal stronger than just CON(ZFC)? [closed]

is it even stronger than that ZFC has a transtitive model?
huhao's user avatar
  • 21
-1 votes
1 answer
261 views

Is Proper Class Choice equivalent to Global Choice?

Working in "MK-Regularity-Limitation of Size + Replacement for sets", call it the Base theory, let's coin the following axiom: Axiom of Super-Choice:$$\forall \ relation \ R \ \exists F \...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
402 views

Ubiquity beyond infinity, transitive closure and the recursion theorem?

I am considering a Principle of Ubiquity, expressed as follows - for a class theory where precisely the elements are sets - with the aid of set abstracts: For $\alpha(y,z)$ a first order condition so ...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
-1 votes
3 answers
637 views

What is the consistency strength of Z+ Accessibility?

Informally the axiom schema of accessibility states that for each unary function $F$ that is definable over the whole universe of discourse "in the language of set theory", like the powerset function $...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
-2 votes
1 answer
155 views

Does MK prove internally that there are more proper classes than sets?

Is the following provable in MK? $\not \exists S: \\ \text{ } \\1. \ \ \forall s \in S \exists a,b (s=\langle a,b \rangle) \\ \text{ } \\2. \ \ \forall x (set(x) \to \exists! X (\neg set(X) \land \{...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
-2 votes
1 answer
167 views

If we limit matters what ZFC can prove, would that be consistent?

I was thinking about a principle that occurred to me regarding provability in ZFC and truth. The principle outrageously states that: whatever ZFC shows, it is! In other words whatever ZFC can prove ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
-3 votes
1 answer
117 views

Can stratification be used to internalize functions on models of $\sf Z$?

Suppose $M$ is a model of $\sf Z +\neg AC$ that is externally bijective to an element $k \in M$. Obviously if $j$ denotes such an external bijection, then it cannot be used in Separation within $M$, ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
-3 votes
1 answer
296 views

Can this form of reflection be consistent?

Is this form of reflection consistent? First I'll begin by clarifying the notation I'm using here: By a quantifier being relativized or bounded it means that the first occurrence of the quantified ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
-4 votes
1 answer
267 views

Is Nested Selection equivalent to AC?

Nested Selection: For every infinite set $G$ of pairwise disjoint infinite sets such that any two distinct elements $x,y$ of $G$ either "$y$ is a set of proper supersets of elements of $x$ and ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
-4 votes
1 answer
198 views

Is Bounding Reflection consistent?

Working in the first order language of set theory. Let $\varphi^{*B}$ be the formula obtained from $\varphi$ by merely bounding all open quantifiers in $\varphi$ by the symbol "$B$". Here a ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar

1
19 20 21 22
23