Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
2 answers
228 views

Can this semi-constructible structure satisfy existence of a measurable cardinal?

If we add a primitive unary function symbol $\mathfrak L$ to the first order language of set theory. Axiom of semi-constructibility: if $\phi^\alpha (y,x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ is a formula in which all and ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
556 views

Does this ZFC+V=L like theory, have a limit on large cardinal properties?

Let $\sf T$ be a theory that has as axioms every axiom of $\sf ZFC$, and every theorem of $\sf ZFC + [V=L]$ that is neither provable nor disprovable by $\sf ZFC$, whose addition or addition of its ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
7 votes
2 answers
311 views

At what ordinal $\chi$ does $\mathrm{L}_\chi$ contain a surjection from $\omega$ to $\mathrm{L}_{\beta_0}$?

Let $\mathrm{ZF^-}$ be $\mathrm{ZF}$ minus power set, and let $\beta_0$ be the ordinal for ramified analysis so that $\mathrm{L}_{\beta_0}$ is the least $\mathrm{L}$-model of $\mathrm{ZF}^-$. Clearly, ...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
112 views

Constructible cardinality downslides and their consistency strengths?

Posting "Large cardinals and constructible universe" mentions that $\omega_1^L < \omega_1$ if we assume Ramsey cardinal. My question can we have more downslides like for example $\omega_2^...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
14 votes
1 answer
619 views

Ordinal realizability vs the constructible universe

Koepke's paper Turing Computations on Ordinals defines a notion of "ordinal computability" using Turing machines with a tape the length of Ord and that can run for Ord-many steps, and shows ...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 66.8k
4 votes
1 answer
158 views

Impact of coining $L$ in $\mathcal L_{\omega_1, \omega}$ on which large cardinals it can satisfy?

What happens to the constructible universe $L$ if we build it in the first of infinitary languages $\mathcal L_{\omega_1, \omega}$? Would the usual limitation of $L$ not satisfying existence of a ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
2k views

Are some interesting mathematical statements minimal?

Gödel's set $\mathrm{L}$, of constructible sets, decides many interesting mathematical statements, as the Continuum hypothesis and the Axiom of Choice. Are some interesting mathematical questions, ...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
174 views

How does the cardinality of a set and its powerset compare in the hereditarily rank-concordant constructible world?

Working in the constructible universe "$L$", if we define two kinds of ranks for any constructible set $x$, one being the ordinal index of the first $L_\alpha$ where $x$ appears as a subset ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
432 views

Models of second-order arithmetic closed under relative constructibility

I know little to nothing about second-order arithmetic and its subsystems. However, I would like to understand when a model of (a subsystem of) second-order arithmetic ($\mathsf{Z}_2$) is downward ...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,286
2 votes
1 answer
269 views

Inner model for KP and a Well-Ordering of the Reals

It is well known that Gödel proved the following theorem: $\mathsf{ZFC + V=L}$ has a $\mathit{\Delta}^1_2$-good well-ordering of $\mathbb{R}$. (Gödel, Addison) So: Is there an inner model for KP/Z/....
Ember Edison's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
163 views

Can the Constructible Universe be built in absence of Unions and Power?

Can $L$ be built in $\sf ZF$ $\sf-Regularity-Union-Power+ Boolean \ Union$? We know that $L$ can be built in $\sf KP$, but here we don't have Set Union. If the answer is to the negative, then would ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
142 views

Must models of the following theory satisfying opposing infinitary sentences, satisfy opposing finitary sentences?

This is a follow-up to posting titled "Is this theory finitary first order complete?" Recall the theory presented at that posting. Replace the size axiom by the following: $\textbf{...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
160 views

Is this theory finitary first order complete?

If we coin a theory in $\mathcal L_{\omega_1, \omega}$ that begins with constructing pure true well founded finite sets, then the set of all true well founded hereditarily finite sets, then builds up ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
14 votes
1 answer
695 views

Can $L$ be defined without parameters?

If we omit parameters in the definition of $L$ would the result still be $L$? That is, we define a successor stage $L_{\alpha+1}$ in the constructible universe $L$, without including parameters; as: $...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
243 views

Is stable ordinals in non-well-founded model the same as well founded models?

Let $BST$ be the axiom system $KP$ - $\Delta_0$ collection. For an ordinal $\alpha$, we say that $\alpha$ is $\varphi$-$\Sigma_n$-stable, if there is a $\beta>\alpha$ satisfies the formula $φ$ such ...
Reflecting_Ordinal's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
541 views

Are all constructible from below sets parameter free definable?

Lets take the intersection of the theory of $L_{\omega_1^{CK}}$ and $\sf ZF + [V=L]$, this is equivalent to the theory of constructability from below + limit stages. Can this theory prove the ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
346 views

Which one of the following two ordinals is larger?

We say that $\alpha$ is $\Sigma_n$-extendable (to $\beta$), if there is $\beta>\alpha$ such that $L_\alpha$ is a $\Sigma_n$ elementary submodel of $L_\beta$. First ordinal: the least $\alpha_0$ ...
Reflecting_Ordinal's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
235 views

End elementary extension in infinitary logic of some $L_\alpha$ producing a $L_\beta$

Let $L_\alpha$ be some admissible level of the constructible hierarchy and $M \supseteq L_\alpha$ an extension of $L_\alpha$. I am looking for conditions under which $M \simeq L_\beta$. It is not ...
Johan's user avatar
  • 531
5 votes
2 answers
386 views

Terminology for ordinals whose constructible level is the least one satisfying some formula

An ordinal $\alpha$ is "meta-definable" by some formula $\varphi$ without free variables if: $$ \begin{cases} L_\alpha \models\varphi \\ \forall\beta < \alpha \, L_\beta \not\models \...
Johan's user avatar
  • 531
1 vote
0 answers
266 views

Is Jensen's covering lemma meaningful in a platonist's view?

The typical applications of fine structure theory are finding out the lower bounds of consistency strength of axiom systems. In such a proccess, we also constructs many combinatorial objects in core ...
Reflecting_Ordinal's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
439 views

What's the order type of the following set?

Fix a positive integer n. Assume $Lan=\{R_0,R_1,...,R_n\}$ be a language of first order logic, where every $R_i$ is a 2-ary relation symbol. Assume $M$ is an Lan-model, where the underlying set is $...
Reflecting_Ordinal's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
253 views

Is this recursion theoretic analogue of a criterion of weakly compact cardinal accurate?

Jensen proved that, if V=L, and $\kappa$ is a regular cardinal, then if for any stationary $A\subseteq \kappa$, the set $\{\alpha\mid A \text{ is stationary below }\alpha\}$ is stationary in $\kappa$, ...
Reflecting_Ordinal's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
191 views

At which large cardinal, the theory of the minimal transitive model of ZFC starts proving its absence?

Let's take the minimal transitive model of $\sf ZFC$ which, I came to know, is some minimal $L_\kappa$ for a countable $\kappa$, that models $\sf ZFC$, and since its minimal so no subset of it can be ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
303 views

When does $\Pi_2$-reflection on $X$ fail to imply iterated $\Pi_1$-reflection on $X$?

Let lowercase Greek letters denote ordinals. Recall from Richter and Aczel's "Inductive definitions and reflecting properties of admissible ordinals", for a set of formulae $\Gamma$ and a ...
C7X's user avatar
  • 2,031
1 vote
0 answers
170 views

Can Jensen's covering lemma be proven easier in generic extensions of L?

Jensen's covering lemma, stating that if there is no $0^\#$ in V, then some covering property holds true, has a very complex proof. In any generic extension L[G] of L, $0^\#$ don't exist, so the ...
Reflecting_Ordinal's user avatar
7 votes
2 answers
518 views

Can countable ordinals start gaps of every order in the constructible universe?

Define "$\alpha$ starts a gap of order $n+1$ and length $\beta$" iff $\mathcal P^n(\omega)\cap (L_{\alpha+\beta}\setminus L_\alpha)=\emptyset\land\forall\gamma\in\alpha: L_\alpha\setminus L_\...
Boris Dimitrov's user avatar
9 votes
2 answers
426 views

Can local $0^\#$ exists in L?

Assume $0^\#$ exists and there is an inaccessible cardinal. Are there two transitive sets $M,N$ s.t. $M\in N,M\vDash ZF+V=L[0^\#],N\vDash ZF+V=L$?
Reflecting_Ordinal's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
395 views

If $L_\alpha \vDash ZFC$, then do we have $L_{\alpha+1} \vDash \alpha\text{ is inaccessible}$?

Here we choose the definition of "is a cardinal" as there is no surjective map from a smaller ordinal to it. It's easy to prove that, if $L_{\alpha+1} \vDash\ \alpha\text{ is inaccessible}$, ...
Reflecting_Ordinal's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
407 views

Is this relation about elementary embedding transitive?

For ordinals $\alpha<\beta$, we say $\alpha<_{el}\beta$, if there is an elementary embedding with domain $L_\beta$ and critical point $\alpha$. Is $<_{el}$ transitive?
Reflecting_Ordinal's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
202 views

Consistency strength of Sy Friedman's result about admissibility spectrum

A result by Sy Friedman in his book "fine structure and class forcing", is that, assume $0^\sharp$ exists, there exists a real number R such that the ordinals admissible in R (called $\...
Reflecting_Ordinal's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
407 views

Height of diamond

Assume $V=L$. Let $\alpha$ be the least ordinal such that there is a $\Diamond_{\omega_1}$-sequence in $L_\alpha$. It's obvious that $\omega_1 < \alpha < \omega_2$. Do we have some better ...
Reflecting_Ordinal's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
70 views

Can all sets in stratified L above some stage be proximate?

Define stratified $L$, denoted by $^S L$, as: Let $S$ be the set of all stratified formulas in first order language of set theory. Define: ${ }^S Def (X) = \{\{y \in X \mid (X, \in) \models \phi(y,z_1,...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
-2 votes
1 answer
294 views

What does the Concordant constructible universe model?

Define a ranking function $\cal R$ as: $\mathcal{R}: V \to ON; \,\mathcal {R}(x)= \min \alpha \, \forall y \in x: \alpha > \mathcal {R}(y) $ Now the constructible rank $\mathcal R^c$ of a set $X$ ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
627 views

Is $\mathsf{ZFC+V=L}$ consistently $\omega$-complete?

This was previously asked and bountied on MSE: For brevity, let $T$ be $\mathsf{ZFC+V=L}$. Say that an extension of $\mathsf{ZFC}$ is $\omega$-complete iff it has exactly one $\omega$-model up to ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
325 views

If we have a class like $L$ but allowing a set number of unbounded quantifiers, is it strict superset of $L$?

The definition of $L$ only permits bounded quantifiers. If we allow a certain number of unbounded quantifiers, does this result in a strict superset of $L$? For example: $$ \operatorname{Def}^{\...
Christopher King's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
294 views

End-extension in Gödel's constructible universe

Given two ordinals $\alpha < \beta$, considering the subsets of Gödel's constructible universe, one say that $L_\beta$ is a $\Sigma_n$ end-extension of $L_\alpha$ (and $L_\alpha$ is an $\Sigma_n$ ...
Johan's user avatar
  • 531
6 votes
3 answers
837 views

Is the power set axiom essential for constructing L?

Take ZFC, remove axiom of Power set, and put instead of it the following axiom: Axiom of Successor Cardinals: $\forall \kappa\, \exists x \, \forall \alpha \, ( \alpha \leq \kappa \to \alpha \in x)$ ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
592 views

Is ZFC interpretable in a kind of an extended form of second order arithmetic?

Informally the following theory is a kind of extension of second order arithmetic, where numbers are not limited to naturals, instead here we have formation of further numbers by setting limits on ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
440 views

Capturing the $\omega_1^{\mathrm{CK}}$-th stage of Gödel's constructible hierarchy

For an ordinal $\alpha$, let $L_\alpha$ be the $\alpha^{th}$ set of Gödel's constructible hierarchy and let $\omega_1^{\mathrm{CK}}$ be the first non-recursive ordinal or the first admissible ordinal ...
Johan's user avatar
  • 531
4 votes
0 answers
144 views

Can this reflective class theory interpret ZFC?

Reflective Set Theory $\mathsf{RfST}$ is formulated in first order predicate logic with extra-logical primitives of equality $``="$, membership $``\in"$, and a single primitive constant symbol $V$ ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
150 views

Is "ZF+ V=L" an upper limit theory for cardinal decidability (per its strength)?

{EDIT: this posting has been edited, the additional text is in italics} If $\varphi, \psi$ are two parameter free formulas in the language of set theory $T$ such that there is a theorem of $T$ that ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
203 views

What is the strength of this strict constructible iterative hierarchy?

Begin with the empty set then construct the set of the empty set, then construct the set of all subsets of the latter set, then at each level of construction construct the next level as the set all ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
864 views

Is the smallest $L_\alpha$ with undefinable ordinals always countable?

Let $\mathfrak{t}$ be the least ordinal such that $L_{\mathfrak{t}}$ has undefinable ordinals; i.e. there is an $\alpha<\mathfrak{t}$ such that $L_{\mathfrak{t}}$ cannot define $\alpha$. This ...
Keith Millar's user avatar
  • 1,252
10 votes
1 answer
452 views

Stability for the Gödel and Jensen hierarchies

Notations: Let $L_\alpha$ stand for the Gödel constructible hierarchy ($L_0=\varnothing$ and $L_{\alpha+1} = \mathrm{def}(L_\alpha)$ is the set of definable subsets of $L_\alpha$ and $L_\delta = \...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 32.5k
7 votes
1 answer
398 views

How similar are large cardinals, over $L$?

EDIT: Joel's answer shows that no $\Sigma_2$ large cardinal property will do the job - however, $\Pi_2$ properties (such as unfoldability and its relatives) may still be useful. Throughout this ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
428 views

Further research on $\mathrm L_{\infty}$

In the mathoverflow question , "Godel's Constructible Universe in Infinitary Logics (A Possible Solution to $HOD$ Problem), Prof Hamkins answered user46667's question 2 What is $\mathrm L_{\infty}$?...
Thomas Benjamin's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
147 views

When do wide initial segments ruin admissibility?

Suppose $\alpha$ is admissible and $\beta<\alpha$. We know that $L_\alpha$ is an admissible set (by definition), but adding subsets of $\beta$ to $L_\alpha$ might break admissibility: while set ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
144 views

Levels of L resembling each other, take 2

(Everything below is assuming $V=L$.) Fix an uncountable regular cardinal $\kappa$, and let $$E_\kappa=\{\mu<\kappa: \mbox{there is an elementary substructure of $L_\kappa$ isomorphic to $L_\mu$}\}...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
267 views

Fine structure question: when do levels of $L$ look "a lot" like each other?

(Everything is assuming $V=L$.) Fix an uncountable regular cardinal $\kappa$, and let $$E_\kappa=\{\mu<\kappa: \mbox{there is an elementary substructure of $L_\kappa$ isomorphic to $L_\mu$}\},$$ ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
623 views

Is every ordinal potentially definable?

It is easy to see that, if $V\models\alpha>\omega_1^{CK}$, then $\alpha$ is not recursive in any forcing extension of $V$. The argument goes as follows: The relation "$\Phi_e=r$" is $\Pi^0_2$. The ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar