Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
9 votes
2 answers
421 views

How do these definitions of factorization algebra compare?

Question Several sources define (homotopy) factorization algebras in a seemingly different manner (I am looking at [CG], [Gi], and [CFM].) I wish to know how they compare with each other. I apologize ...
Ken's user avatar
  • 2,292
6 votes
1 answer
315 views

Commuting homotopy colimits and arbitrary products in spaces

Let $X : D \rightarrow Spc$ be a diagram with values in the $\infty$-category of spaces and $I$ some (discrete) set, not necessarily finite. ($D$ can be a 1-category if that makes statements easier, ...
Georg Lehner's user avatar
  • 2,303
3 votes
0 answers
163 views

Classifying spaces of amalgamated topological monoids

Let $\mathsf{Top}_*$ be the category of well-based spaces and $\mathsf{TopMon}$ the category of topological monoids. Recall the James construction $\mathcal{J}:\mathsf{Top}_*\to \mathsf{TopMon}$ which ...
FKranhold's user avatar
  • 1,623
9 votes
0 answers
393 views

When is an increasing union a colimit?

Let's consider a diagram $\Phi: \lambda \to \mathcal{T}_*$ $$ X_0 \to X_1 \to \cdots \to X_\xi \to X_{\xi+1} \to \cdots $$ of pointed spaces, indexed by some ordinal $\lambda$, in which each $X_\xi$ ...
Jeff Strom's user avatar
  • 12.5k
9 votes
1 answer
609 views

Higher-dimensional version of the "Magic Cube Lemma" for homotopy pushouts/pullbacks

The "Magic Cube Lemma" is a surprising (to me) relationship between (homotopy) pushouts and (homotopy) pullbacks of spaces: Consider a cubical diagram $I^3\to \mathcal{S}$ in the $\infty$-category of ...
Tashi Walde's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
156 views

Contractibility of a poset-indexed colimit

Let $(X,\leq)$ be a poset with distinguished element $p$, and let $P'$ be the poset of "finite chains which weakly descend to $p$" given by all $\sigma = (x_0 \geq x_1 \geq \cdots \geq x_k \geq p)$ ...
Vidit Nanda's user avatar
  • 15.5k
3 votes
0 answers
361 views

Which reflexive coequalizer diagrams are projectively cofibrant?

Consider the walking reflexive pair category W, which consists of two objects 0 and 1 and three generating morphisms f: 0→1, g: 0→1, and h: 1→0 satisfying the relation fh=gh=id₁. Consider the ...
Dmitri Pavlov's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
528 views

Homotopy category of groupoids

The nlab Ho(Cat) page says: morphisms in the homotopy category of groupoids $Ho(Gpd)$, have two equivalent description: iso-classes of functors. formally invert equivalence functors (i.e. ...
Ma Ming's user avatar
  • 1,271
5 votes
1 answer
724 views

Which E_∞-spaces are homotopy colimits of k-truncated E_∞-spaces?

This question is closely related to my previous question about modules over truncated sphere spectra, in particular, it has the same motivation. Recall that every space (or ∞-groupoid) can be ...
Dmitri Pavlov's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
496 views

Cech cohomology as a colimit over maps to a CW complex

Given a topological space $X$, we consider the following category $\mathsf{CW}_{X\to}$. The objects are finite CW complexes $Y$ equipped with a continuous map $X\to Y$. The morphisms are continuous ...
John Pardon's user avatar
  • 18.7k
10 votes
2 answers
863 views

Fubini theorem for hocolim

I wanted to ask the following question, Suppose $\mathbf{M}$ a cofibrantly generated model category and $I,~J$ two small categories. Suppose that $F:J\rightarrow \mathbf{M}^{\mathrm{I}}$ is a functor. ...
Ilias A.'s user avatar
  • 1,974