Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
1 answer
210 views

Making a map in sheaf cohomology involving a theta characteristic explicit

Motivation: For a given rank 2 vector bundle we want to know how many theta-characteristic valued twisted endomorphisms it has. Setting: Let $C$ be a smooth algebraic curve over a field of ...
clemens_nollau's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
441 views

Where can I find a definition of $\underline{H}^p(X, \mathscr{F})$?

Let $X$ be a topological space and $\mathscr{F}$ a sheaf on $X$. In the paper Tropical cycle classes for non-archimedean spaces and weight decomposition of de Rham cohomology sheaves by Yifeng Liu, ...
Jakob Werner's user avatar
  • 1,153
1 vote
0 answers
199 views

Künneth formula for local cohomology with support

In "Differential operators on the flag varieties" (http://www.numdam.org/article/AST_1981__87-88__43_0.pdf) by Brylinski, he uses on page 53 a Künneth formula for local cohomology with ...
KKD's user avatar
  • 473
3 votes
2 answers
371 views

Extension between vector bundles inducing non-zero map on cohomology

Let $X$ be a projective variety over a field $k$ equipped with a very ample line bundle $\mathcal{O}_X(1)$. Suppose that $E, F$ are locally free sheaves of finite rank on $X$ and $c\in \mathrm{Ext}^i(...
SashaP's user avatar
  • 7,377
2 votes
0 answers
136 views

A infinity structure on Yoneda Ext group

I am currently trying to control an $A_\infty$-algebra of the form $\mathrm{Ext}_X(F\oplus F'[2n-2],F\oplus F'[2n-2])$ where $X$ is a nice enough scheme and $F,F'$ are sheaves that are NOT locally ...
Felix's user avatar
  • 213
8 votes
1 answer
622 views

Can one determine the trace map for a nonsingular projective variety explicitly?

I've never understood how one would actually go about computing a trace map associated with the canonical sheaf on a smooth projective variety, if it's even possible. Hartshorne proves that the ...
forget this's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
244 views

Boundness of torsion in $R^i\pi_*\mathcal F$ for a smooth $\pi:X\rightarrow S$

Let $\pi:X\rightarrow S$ be a smooth scheme over $S$ and let's assume for simplicity that $S=\mathrm{Spec} R$ is affine, Noetherian and regular. Let $\mathcal F$ be a coherent sheaf on $X$ and let's ...
user42024's user avatar
  • 790
3 votes
0 answers
154 views

$\operatorname{Ext}^2(O,\omega)$ as a higher extension on $\mathbb{P}^1 \times \mathbb{P}^1$

Let $X = \mathbb{P}^1 \times \mathbb{P}^1$ over a field $k$ and consider $Ext^2(\mathcal{O}_X,\omega_X)\cong H^2(\omega_X) = H^2(\mathcal{O}_X(-2,-2)) = k$ Let $C = \mathbb{P}^1$. By Kunneth $H^2(\...
solbap's user avatar
  • 3,968
16 votes
1 answer
2k views

Where am I suppose to actually learn how to compute hypercohomology?

I'm reading about algebraic de Rham cohomology over characteristic zero which is constructed using hypercohomology. Already, constructing injective resolutions is difficult, and coupling this with ...
54321user's user avatar
  • 1,716
4 votes
0 answers
137 views

Cohomology of $Sym^m Q \otimes Sym^k Q \otimes L^p$

Let $V$ be a complex vector space. Let $L=\mathcal{O}(-1)$ and $Q=V/L$ be the quotient bundle over $\mathbb{P}V$. I'm trying to compute the cohomologies with coefficients in $Sym^m Q \otimes Sym^k Q \...
clementine's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
515 views

For what kind of sheaves can we always extend a sheaf map from a closed subset to the whole space?

Let $X$ be a topological space. We know that a sheaf on $X$ is call soft if for any closed subset $Z$ of $X$, a section on $Z$ can be always extend to a section on $X$. Now we consider a similar ...
Zhaoting Wei's user avatar
  • 9,019
0 votes
1 answer
156 views

The Existence of Pure Resolutions, Given a Degree Sequence?

I have been trying to understand the proof of the following theorem for the last month, I read some basics of sheaves theory and their cohomology, but still can't get the idea of this important ...
user avatar
62 votes
8 answers
14k views

Sheaf cohomology and injective resolutions

In defining sheaf cohomology (say in Hartshorne), a common approach seems to be defining the cohomology functors as derived functors. Is there any conceptual reason for injective resolution to come ...
user avatar