Skip to main content

All Questions

8 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
14 votes
0 answers
3k views

Ample divisors on projective surfaces

Question: If $X$ is a projective surface and $U$ is an open affine subset of $X$, then is it true that $X \setminus U$ is the support of an (effective) ample divisor on $X$? Background: I was reading ...
pinaki's user avatar
  • 5,359
4 votes
0 answers
172 views

How close is $h^0(mD)$ to be a polynomial?

Let $X$ be a normal (or smooth if it helps) projective variety over an algebraically closed field $k$. Fix a Cartier divisor $D$: I am interested in knowing how $h^0(mD)$ behaves as $m$ varies. At ...
Stefano's user avatar
  • 625
2 votes
0 answers
149 views

Non-proper intersection between divisors on $\mathbb{P}^1$-bundle of Hirzebruch surfaces

We are working on algebraic closed field $k$. Let $\mathbb{F}_1$ be the Hirzebruch surface $\mathbb{P}(\mathcal{O}\oplus\mathcal{O}(-1))$, $C_0$ and $C_{\infty}$ are its zero and infinity sections ...
James Tan's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
154 views

Structure of the big cone and Seshadri constant on Fano manifolds

I would like to know something about the following two questions. Given $X$ Fano manifold and $L$ an ample line bundle on $X$, we define \begin{gather} \sigma(L,x):=\sup\{t>0\, :\, \mu^{*}L-tE \,\,...
Trusio's user avatar
  • 71
1 vote
0 answers
47 views

Positivity of self-intersection of dicisor associated to meromorphic function

In the book "Holomorphic Vector Bundles over Compact Complex Surfaces" by Vasile Brînzănescu, in the proof of theorem 2.13 there is the following claim Let $X$ be a compact non-algebraic ...
JerryCastilla's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
168 views

Rational classes of $(-2)$-curves in a minimal surface of general type

Let $X$ be a minimal surface of general type over $\mathbb{C}$. One can show that if for any set of $(-2)$-curves $C_1,\cdots,C_l$ on $X$, there exists $k$, $1\le k\le l$ such that $$\sum_{i=1}^k\...
astana's user avatar
  • 41
1 vote
0 answers
91 views

Picard numbers of isogenous K3 surfaces over a non-closed field

Let $S_1, S_2$ be K3 surfaces defined over a field $k$ and $\phi\!: S_1 \dashrightarrow S_2$ a dominant rational $k$-map (so-called isogeny). It is known that $\rho(S_1) = \rho(S_2)$ for the complex ...
Dimitri Koshelev's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
895 views

Restriction of a Cartier divisor

Let $X$ be a surface (so $2$-dimensional proper $k$-scheme) $D \subset X$ an effective Cartier divisor of $X$ which corresponding to an invertible sheaf $\mathcal{L}=O_X(D)$ and $C \subset X$ a closed ...
user267839's user avatar
  • 5,976