2
$\begingroup$

I was trying to solve the following integral: $$I = \oint _{|z|=1}\frac{dz}{2 \pi i z}\int_{0}^{\infty} dr \dfrac{e^{-\tfrac{r^2}{z^2}}r^{2n+1}}{z^2(z-1)} $$

  • The singular structure in the $z$ integral is coming from the $z= 0$ and $z = 1$ points.
  • From the term $ e^{-\tfrac{r^2}{z^2}}$, the integral over $r$ is giving a divergent contribution for $\tfrac{\pi}{4} \leq \mathop{\mathrm{Arg}}(z) \leq \tfrac{3\pi}{4} \; \; \& \; \; \tfrac{5 \pi}{4} \leq \mathop{\mathrm{Arg}}(z) \leq \tfrac{7\pi}{4} $

My question is, can we somehow give some argument like analytic continuation or modify the contour so that we can assign some convergent value to $I$?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Before even worrying about the $r$-integration, you'd have to say what it means that your $z$-integration path goes right through the pole at $z=1$. Is it a principal value? Or some other prescription? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 17, 2020 at 6:11

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

Technically, your integral is not well-defined because the path goes through $z=1$; the remedy I see presently (unless you have a definition for the contour going through $z=1$), is to move the contour slightly within the unit disc (and slightly outside it) and compute the integral as the average of the two or as either obtained values (I presume the contour is counterclockwise and $n$ is a nonnegative integer): $$I=\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}\int_0^\infty r^{2n+1}\left(\frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{|z|=1\pm\epsilon}\frac{e^{-r^2/z^2}}{z^3(z-1)}dz\right)dr\,,$$ where $\epsilon\in(0,1)$. If we choose $\pm = +$, then we can easily determine (say by series expansion) that the contour integral vanishes because the poles within the interior of the contour are $z=0$ and $z=1$, whereas if we choose $\pm = -$, the contour integral takes the value $-e^{-r^2}$, arising from the sole pole $z=0$ in the interior of the contour. The integral then reduces to $$I=- \int_0^\infty r^{2n+1}e^{-r^2}dr=-\frac{1}{2}n!\,,$$ where the evaluation is well-known (see for instance, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_integral).

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Is the contribution from $z=0$ quite that simple? The $e^{-r^2/z^2 } /z^3 $ gives you a series of terms $\sim 1/z^3 , 1/z^5 , 1/z^7 ...$ and that gets multiplied by the geometric series, so you gather up a whole series of simple poles ... $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 17, 2020 at 7:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I presume you mean the case $\pm=-$; here the integrand is $\frac{e^{-r^2/z^2}}{z^3(z-1)}$ and the term $\frac{1}{z-1}$ allows a series expansion about $z=0$ as $$\frac{e^{-r^2/z^2}}{z^3(z-1)}=-\sum_{m\ge 0} \frac{e^{-r^2/z^2}}{z^3}z^m\,.$$ It quickly becomes apparent then why the residue is $-e^{-r^2}$ (say, if you expand $e^{-r^2/z^2}$ using its standard series expansion). $\endgroup$
    – Jack L.
    Commented Dec 17, 2020 at 7:03
  • $\begingroup$ You are right - the whole series of simple poles I was referring to adds up to precisely that. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 17, 2020 at 7:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .