11
$\begingroup$

The convex combination of convex polytopes is a convex polytope. An example in $\mathbb{R}^2$ is that a regular octagon can be obtained as $\frac{1}{2} S + \frac{1}{2} S'$, where $S$ is a square and $S'$ is the same square rotated $45^\circ$—it is the mean of two squares:
alt text
Of special interest to me are (a) convex polyhedra in $\mathbb{R}^3$, (b) combinations of just two polyhedra, and (c) where both are regular or semi-regular. For example, the truncated cuboctahedron (a.k.a. the great rhombicuboctahedron) "is the Minkowski sum of a cube and a truncated octahedron" (quoting from a paper ["Zonohedra and Zonotopes"] by David Eppstein). (It is also the sum of three cubes!)

My question is, essentially:

Which regular and semi-regular polyhedra can be obtained as convex combinations of pairs of other regular and semi-regular polyhedra, and which cannot be so represented—are 'prime' or unique in this respect?

I've searched around for a definitive tabulation of this information without success. It must be all known?

Particular subquestions and generalizations include:

  1. Can any of the Platonic solids be realized as sums of two other Platonic solids?
  2. Which of the semi-regular (Archimedean solids) can be realized as sums of two Platonic solids?
  3. I hesitate to delve into the [Johnson solids][14] ...
  4. Can any of the 4D regular polytopes be realized as sums of pairs of other 4D regular polytopes?
  5. Can any of the three regular polytopes in dimension $d>4$ (the simplex, the hypercube, the orthoplex) be realized as sums of either of the other two?
  6. Is there some general underlying theorem lurking here?

I can make (informed?) guesses and proof sketches for several of these questions, but would prefer to defer to the experts. Any observations on any aspect of these (sub)questions, references, comments, would be appreciated. Thanks!

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Q1 is easy. The octahedron is a sum of two tetrahedra (each iverted through the center from the other), and the icosahedron is a sum of five tetrahedra (wrapped around a fivefold axis and so inclined that they are also wrapped around all the other fivefold axes). $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2023 at 20:54

2 Answers 2

9
$\begingroup$

If you talk about convex combinations I fail to see an interesting question because every convex polyhedron is the convex combination of (very small) regular tetrahedra placed inside the polyhedron so that each vertex of the polyhedron is a vertex of at least one of these tetrahedra.

A possible variation of this is to ask which semi-regular polyhedra are the convex hull of a polyhedral compound. In other words, which semi-regular polyhedra admit a nontrivial symmetric facetting? I think the answer to this is all semi-regular polyhedra except the tetrahedron and octahedron. For example the cube is the convex hull of the Stellated octahedron etc. Since there are comprehensive lists or programs you can use to figure out the possible polyhedral compounds such a search shouldn't be impossible.

As for the interpretation using Minkowski sum, I could observe the following decompositions of Archimedean solids

  • The truncated tetrahedron is the Minkowski sum of two tetrahedra
  • The cuboctahedron is the Minkowski sum of two tetrahedra
  • The truncated cube is the Minkowski sum of a cube and a cubeoctahedron
  • The truncated octahedron is the Minkowski sum of an octahedron and a cuboctahedron
  • The rhombicuboctahedron is the Minkowski sum of an octahedron and a cube
  • The truncated cuboctahedron is the Minkowski sum of a rhombicuboctahedron and a cuboctahedron
  • The rhombicosidodecahedron is the Minkowski sum of a dodecahedron and an icosahedron
  • The truncated icosahedron is the Minkowski sum of an icosidodecahedron and an icosahedron
  • The truncated dodecahedron is the Minkowski sum of a dodecahedron and an icosidodecahedron
  • The truncated icosidodecahedron is the Minkowski sum of an icosidodecahedron and a rhombicosidodecahedron
$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Gjergji: Your long list is exactly what I was unable to find--Thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 29, 2010 at 13:48
  • $\begingroup$ "The truncated octahedron is the Minkowski sum of an octahedron and a cuboctahedron" I can't find any source that confirms this, rather "the great rhombicuboctahedron is the Minkowski sum of an octahedron and a cuboctahedron" Discrete Geometry and Symmetry volume 234 pg.89 $\endgroup$
    – Некто
    Commented May 21, 2022 at 17:42
5
$\begingroup$

I think the whole list of Gjiergji (and lightly more, see below) follows from Wythoffian operations. For the cube-octahedron family, for example, consider the following diagram:Wythoffian operations

The polyhedron along an edge of the triangle is the Minkowski sum of the two vertices of that edge, which gives:

  • The truncated cube is the Minkowski sum of a cube and a cube octahedron
  • The truncated octahedron is the Minkowski sum of an octahedron and a cuboctahedron
  • The rhombicuboctahedron is the Minkowski sum of an octahedron and a cube

The polyhedron inside the triangle is the Minkowski sum of the three vertices or, equivalently, the Minkowski sum of a vertex and the opposite edge. This gives:

  • The truncated cuboctahedron is the Minkowski sum of a rhombicuboctahedron and a cuboctahedron

but also

  • The truncated cuboctahedron is the Minkowski sum of a cube and a truncated octahedron.
  • The truncated cuboctahedron is the Minkowski sum of an octahedron and a truncated cube.
$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .