Assume $\Omega$ is a bounded subset of $\Bbb R^d$ and $ (u_n)_n$ is a bounded sequence of the Sobolev space $H^1(\Omega)$.

Question: Can we say that $ (u_n)_n$ is tight in $L^2(\Omega)$ namely: For very $\varepsilon>0$ there exists a compact set $K_\varepsilon\subset \Omega$ such that $$ \sup_{n}\int_{\Omega\setminus K_\varepsilon }|u_n(x)|^2dx<\varepsilon$$

I failed to find a counter example. Any help or reference in which I can find related topic is welcome.

  • $\begingroup$ If $H^1(\Omega)$ is compactly embedded into $L^2(\Omega)$ in your setting, shouldn't the Vitali convergence theorem and tightness of the Lebesgue measure do the trick? (.. if you are fine with a subsequence ..) $\endgroup$ – Hannes Jun 27 at 15:16

The answer is yes if your domain has compact embedding $H^1(\Omega)\to L^2(\Omega)$ (that is, for any regular enough domain), or you consider $H^1_0(\Omega)$, but no in general. Counterexample is as follows:

Let $\Omega = (\frac{1}{2}, 1)\cup (\frac{1}{8}, \frac{1}{4})\cup (\frac{1}{32}, \frac{1}{16})\cup \ldots = I_1\cup I_2\cup \ldots \subset \mathbb{R}$ and consider functions $f_n = \frac{1}{\sqrt{|I_n|}}\chi_{I_n}$. They all are bounded in $H^1(\Omega)$ (indeed, they has norm $1$), but you can't find a compact $K\subset \Omega$ such that $K\cap I_n \neq \varnothing$ for all $n$ because such a $K$ has to contain $0$ which is not in $\Omega$.

If you do not like nonconnected examples, consider $\Omega_1 = \Omega \times [\frac{1}{2}, 1) \cup (0, 1)\times (0, \frac{1}{2})$ (it looks like a comb), choose a smooth function $g$ with support in $(\frac{3}{5}, \frac{4}{5})$ and consider $g_n(x, y) = f_n(x)g(y)$.

On the other hand, if you have a compact embedding then the answer is yes. First of all let us consider a sequence of compact sets $K_n\subset \Omega$ such that $K_n \subset Int(K_{n+1})$ and $\bigcup K_n = \Omega$ (such a sequence of compacts exists for any manifold and a fortiori for any open subset of $\mathbb{R}^d$). Assume that there exists $\varepsilon > 0$ such that for any $n$ there exists $u_n\in H^1(\Omega)$, $||u_n||_{H^1(\Omega)} = 1$ such that $||u_n||_{L^2(\Omega \backslash K_n)} \ge \varepsilon$. By compactness of embedding (passing to a subsequence, but for notational simplicity I will assume that it is the same sequence) we may assume that $u_n\to u$ in $L^2(\Omega)$. But functions $v_n = |u|^2 \chi_{\Omega \backslash K_n}$ has a common $L^1$-majorant $|u|^2$ and converges pointwise to $0$. Therefore $||v_n||_{L^2(\Omega)} < \varepsilon$ for some $n$ by Lebesgue Theorem. On the other hand $w_m = u_m \chi_{\Omega \backslash K_n}$ converges to $v_n$ in $L^2(\Omega)$. Thus, for big enough $m$ $||w_m||_{L^2(\Omega)} < \varepsilon$. But on the other hand $||w_m||_{L^2(\Omega)} \ge ||u_m||_{L^2(\Omega \backslash K_m)}\ge \varepsilon$ for $m > n$ -- a contradiction.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.