1
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be the infinitesimal generator of a $C_0$-semigroup of linear operators in a Banach space. Let $n$ be a positive integer, $n\geq2$. Is $A^n$ closed?

Here (setting $A^1$ $:=$ $A$, and denoting the domain of $A$ by $\cal{D}(A)$), the operator $A^n$ has been defined inductively for $n=2,3...,$, by $$ {\cal{D}}(A^n):=\{f: f\in {\cal{D}}(A^{n-1})\; \text{and} \; A^{n-1}f \in {\cal{D}}(A) \}, $$ $$ A^{n}f:=A (A^{n-1} f). $$

$\endgroup$
3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Cross-posted from math.stackexchange.com. $\endgroup$ Mar 7 '19 at 7:12
  • $\begingroup$ This is more an exercise and there are many arguments. For example you could show that the resolvent set of $A^n$ is not empty. $\endgroup$ Mar 7 '19 at 8:39
  • $\begingroup$ @AndrásBatkai: This was my first thought, too; but after all, I think it's a bit more subtle: the resolvent set of $A^n$ can indeed by empty (for instance, if the spectrum of $A$ is the left halfplane). So with this argument you can only show that $(A-\lambda)^n$ is closed for some scalar $\lambda$ - but then it is not obvious why this should imply that $A^n$ is closed. $\endgroup$ Mar 7 '19 at 10:47
1
$\begingroup$

Here is a more general result:

Theorem. Let $A$ be a closed linear operator with non-empty resolvent set on a complex Banach space. Then $p(A)$ is a closed operator for every complex polynomial $p$.

Reference: Markus Haase, The Functional Calculus for Sectorial Operators (2006), Proposition A.6.2.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.