The title pretty much covers it: are there good (asymptotic) estimates on the number of knot types whose projection has at most $N$ crossings? Similar question with "projection" replaced by "alternating projection".

up vote 13 down vote accepted

Let $k(n)$ denote the number of prime knots with $n$ crossings, $l(n)$ the number of prime links with $n$ crossings, $a(n)$ the number of alternating prime links with $n$ crossings, and $ak(n)$ the number of prime alternating knots (all unoriented and unordered).

Clearly from inclusion of sets $ak(n)\leq a(n)\leq l(n)$ and $ak(n)\leq k(n)\leq l(n)$.

Then we have

$$2.68 \leq \liminf_{n\to \infty} k(n)^{\frac1n} \leq \liminf_{n\to \infty} l(n)^{\frac1n} \leq 10.398...,$$

where the left is due to Welsh based on Ernst-Sumners (and only counts the growth of 2-bridge knots), and the right estimate is due to Stoimenow.

For alternating knots, one has the same lower bound since 2-bridge knots are alternating. So one has

$$2.68 \leq \liminf_{n\to \infty} ak(n)^{\frac1n} \leq \lim_{n\to \infty} a(n)^{\frac1n} = 6.14793...,$$ the right upper bound coming from Sundberg-Thistlethwaite.

From estimates on the growth of prime knots with $n$ crossings, one should be able to obtain upper bounds on the growth of all knots with $n$ crossings via the prime decomposition. Improved lower bounds over the prime growth are trickier, since we don’t know that crossing number is additive under connect sum.

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.