1
$\begingroup$

Assume $g : (0, 1) \to (0, +\infty)$ is a concave twice continuously differentiable function. We want to make the ratio $$ f(x) := -\frac{g''(x)}{g(x)} $$ grow as $x \to 0$ as fast as possible. Some examples: $$ g(x) = x^p,\ p \in (0, 1),\ \mbox{and}\ f(x) = \frac{p(1 - p)}{x^2}. $$ This is maximal when $p = 1/2$, then $f(x) = 1/(4x^2)$. Also, $$ g(x) = -x\log x\ \mbox{and}\ f(x) = -\frac1{x^2\log x}, $$ which does not grow as fast as $1/(4x^2)$ as $x \to 0$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Do you need $g$ to stay bounded near $0$? $\endgroup$
    – fedja
    Commented Oct 30, 2012 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry for an idiotic question: I misread "concave" as "convex". In what sense is the growth you want "the fastest"? It is not hard to show that you cannot beat $1/(4x^2)$ everywhere on any interval $(0,a)$ but you can go a bit above it at places at the cost of going below it at some other places... $\endgroup$
    – fedja
    Commented Nov 1, 2012 at 3:51
  • $\begingroup$ Dear Fedja, thank you for this suggestion. I am delighted it is not hard, but could you possibly show how to do this? that you cannot beat 1/(4x^2) everywhere on any (0, a)? $\endgroup$
    – Andrey
    Commented Nov 1, 2012 at 8:14

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Sure. Just do the most natural things.

Assume that you can have $g''<-(\frac 14+\delta)x^{-2}g(x)$ on a short interval starting at $0$ with some $\delta>0$. Note that the inequality is invariant under scalings $g(x)\mapsto ag(bx)$, so you can stretch the interval as much as you want and normalize to $g(1)=1$. Now use the compactness of concave functions normalized in such way (harnessing them with a fixed multiplicative convolution to avoid any issues with the differentiablity of the limit if you do not feel like working with generalized derivatives at the moment) and get a solution of the same differential inequality on the whole positive semi-axis.

Since you already suspect that $\sqrt x$ is the worst you can have, write $g(x)=u(x)\sqrt x$, differentiate honestly, and arrive at the inequality $$ u''+x^{-1}u'+\delta x^{-2}u\le 0\\,. $$ Now rewrite it as $$ (xu')'+\delta x^{-1}u\le 0 $$ Since $u>0$, this means at the very least that $xu'$ is decreasing. If $u'$ gets negative anywhere, then you get $u'(x)\le -\frac cx$ at infinity. But then the integral of $u'$ diverges to $-\infty$, so $u$ gets negative itself somewhere, which is impossible. Thus $u'\ge 0$ all the way. But then $u\ge c$, so $(xu')'\le -\frac {\delta c}x$, whence (using the divergence of the harmonic integral again) $xu'$ tends to $-\infty$ making $u'$ eventually negative. Thus, "Kuda ne kin', vezde klin" (I surmise you understand Russian).

Of course, you can achieve $\frac{g''}g<-\frac{1}{4x^2}$ by considering $g(x)=\sqrt x-x^2$ on $(0,1)$ or something like that. So, strictly speaking, $\frac{1}{4x^2}$ is unbeatable only asymptotically, but I assume that this is what you meant from the beginning when asking the question.

I should confess that you arose my curiosity by claiming that you need a solution urgently and reviving an old post of mine to attract my attention. Normally you should understand that people visit MO in their free time and have no obligations whatsoever as to how fast to respond or whether to respond at all. So, I naturally wonder why it couldn't wait for a few hours or days :).

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! Andrey is new here, and I suggested he post his question -- he doesn't know the etiquette yet. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2012 at 19:29
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, sir. I did badly, i understand... The proof is nice, but could you please explain how you extend it from (0, 1) to $(0, \infty)$ $\endgroup$
    – Andrey
    Commented Nov 2, 2012 at 21:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Consider $g(bx)/g(b)$ and let $b\to 0+$. Actually, you do not need infinity here: a sufficiently long interval (double exponential in $1/\delta$) will suffice, so taking the limit is not necessary: just take $b$ really small. You didn't really do badly at all. I just was curious why a mathematical proof might suddenly become an urgent matter. :). $\endgroup$
    – fedja
    Commented Nov 2, 2012 at 23:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .