4
$\begingroup$

First let me give a general form of my question, and then I'll give some motivation and a more specific version of it. Let $K/k$ be a Galois extension of fields with Galois group $G$, and let $X$ be some object defined over $k$. One can endow the group of automorphisms $\mathrm{Aut}(X)$ with the structure of a $G$-module and then use the Galois cohomology set $H^1(G, \mathrm{Aut}(X) )$ to parameterize the $K/k$-twists of $X$; i.e., the $k$-objects that become isomorphic to $X$ over the field $K$. But this theory seems to be useless if we instead take $K / k$ to be a purely inseparable extension. Does there exist a cohomology theory that allows one to describe twists for inseparable extensions?

Here is the motivation for my question. Arnaud Beauville used Galois cohomology to classify up to $k$-conjugacy all finite subgroups $G$ of $\mathrm{PGL}_2(k)$ such that $\mathrm{char}(k) \nmid |G|$. See here for the arXiv version of his paper, and see here for another thread related to this question.) I am trying to extend his description to the case $\mathrm{char}(k) \mid |G|$. One can work exclusively with separable extensions if the characteristic is different from 2, and so Galois cohomology appears to give a perfectly satisfactory answer. But something odd happens in characteristic 2.

Rather than describe the general picture, let me just give an example. Let $k$ be a separably closed field of characteristic 2. One can parameterize the $k$-conjugacy classes of cyclic groups of order~2 in $\mathrm{PGL}_2(k)$ as follows. Any such group $G$ fixes a unique point of $\mathbb{P}^1(k^{(2)})$, where $k^{(2)}$ denotes the compositum of all (inseparable) quadratic extensions of $k$ (inside some fixed algebraic closure $k^a$). Write $k(G)/k$ for the extension given by adjoining the coordinates of this fixed point. The field $k(G)$ depends only on the $k$-conjugacy class of $G$. Let $\mathbb{E}_2(k)$ denote the set of extensions of $k$ of degree at most 2 (again, inside $k^a$). Then the association $G \mapsto k(G)$ gives a bijection $$ \{k\text{-conjugacy classes of cyclic groups of order 2} \} \rightarrow \mathbb{E}_2(k). $$

We can identify $k^\times / (k^\times)^2$ with the set $\mathbb{E}_2(k)$ via the association $\tau \mapsto k(\sqrt{\tau})$. Under this identification, the inverse to the above bijection $$ k^\times / (k^\times)^2 \rightarrow \{k\text{-conjugacy classes of cyclic groups of order 2} \} $$ can be given by $\tau \mapsto \left\{ \left(\begin{smallmatrix} 1 \\ & 1 \end{smallmatrix} \right), \left(\begin{smallmatrix} & \tau^2 \\ 1 & \end{smallmatrix}\right) \right\}$. (A similar strategy shows that $k$-conjugacy classes of dihedral subgroups of fixed order $2n$ with $n$ odd are in bijection with $k^\times / (k^\times)^2$.)

The above parameterization of $k$-conjugacy classes looks remarkably like the kind of answer one gets from Galois cohomology. So is there a cohomological explanation?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Yes, it's called flat cohomology. $\endgroup$
    – anon
    Commented Oct 26, 2011 at 23:49
  • $\begingroup$ @anon - Can you point me to a reference? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 2:27
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I'm only passingly familiar with the book, but Milne's Arithmetic Duality Theorems has a chapter on flat cohomology. jmilne.org/math/Books/index.html $\endgroup$
    – B R
    Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 3:16
  • $\begingroup$ Another key word is Amitsur's (co)homology. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 17:30
  • $\begingroup$ "Something odd happens in characteristic 2"—yet more illustration that 2 is the oddest prime! $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Mar 24 at 17:02

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

I cannot answer your question, but point to the right algebraic framework in my opinion:

There is a well worked out classical (but somewhat underestimated) theory of inseparable Galois extensions. It is Jacobson 1964 I think and is also in Jacobsons book. One just has to get used to the fact that the Galois group is replaced by a (p-restricted) Lie algebra. In my opinion it gets much more conceptual nowadays by looking at Hopf Galois theory, which contains both, but this goes to far for a first answer.

Example: Let your $k=\bar{\mathbb{F}}_2[x]$ and $K=\bar{\mathbb{F}}_2[\sqrt{x}]$ be a quadratic extension. It is purely inseperable. But there is a "Galois derivation" $\partial:K\to K$ with the properties $$\partial\sqrt{x}=1$$ $$\partial(ab)=a\cdot \partial(b)+\partial(a)\cdot b$$ $$char(k)=2\Rightarrow\;\partial x= \sqrt{x}\cdot 1+1\cdot\sqrt{x}=0$$ So it acts trivial on $k$ (meaning for Lie algebras that it act as $0$ ) and is therefor $k$-linear map $\partial(ka)=k\partial(a)$. There is also a normal basis theorem, fairily trivial in this quadratic case.

Hence the "Galois Lie algebra" is the very simple abelian Lie algebra $\partial k$, p-restricted by $\partial^2=0$; respectively by the Hopf algebra $k[\partial]/(\partial^2), \Delta(\partial)=1\otimes \partial+\partial\otimes 1$ which exists as it is only in characteristic 2.

For your question, I suggest at look at cohomology of this Lie algebra with coefficients in a module. For the beginning, one should be able to describe twisted objects over $K$ as you explained.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Since Jacobson's useful older work has dropped off the radar screen for most people (including myself), it would help to give more precise references. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2015 at 14:09
  • $\begingroup$ P.S. Jacobson's volume III (1964) in his old algebra series is one reference, but his interest in inseparability goes back to much earlier papers such as ams.org/journals/tran/1937-042-02/S0002-9947-1937-1501922-7 and ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0011079 (the first freely available online, the second via JSTOR). $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2015 at 14:37
  • $\begingroup$ Springer takes exactly this point of view in Sections 11.1–2 of his "Linear algebraic groups". $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Feb 22, 2018 at 18:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .