3
$\begingroup$

Let $F$ be a local field (whose residue field is $q$) and $E$ its quadratic extension. Let $\pi$ be a irreducible principal series representation $\pi(\chi_1, \chi_2)$ of $GL_F(2)$ especially where $\chi_1, \chi_2$ are unitary characters. Then I know $L_F(s,\pi)=\frac{1}{1-\chi_1(\varpi)q^s} \cdot \frac{1}{1-\chi_2(\varpi)q^s}$. Then what is $L_E(s,BC(\pi))$ in terms of $\chi_1, \chi_2$?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Is $E$ meant to be the unique unramified extension (in char not $2$? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 21, 2014 at 20:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Garrett, you are right!, E is unramified extension. I missed it. $\endgroup$
    – Monty
    Commented Jan 22, 2014 at 3:05
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean to assume that $\chi_i$ are unramified characters? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 22, 2014 at 7:34
  • $\begingroup$ @David, you are right. $\chi_i$ are unramified characters. $\endgroup$
    – Monty
    Commented Jan 22, 2014 at 10:05

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

If $\pi = \pi(\chi_1, \chi_2)$ is an irreducible principal series, then $BC(\pi)$ is the irreducible principal series attached to the unramified characters $\chi_i \circ N_{E/F}$ of $E^\times$. So if the $\chi_i$ are unramified then we have

$$L_E(s, BC(\pi)) = (1 - \chi_1(\varpi)^2 q^{-2s})^{-1}(1 - \chi_2(\varpi)^2 q^{-2s})^{-1}.$$

(The point of base change is that it corresponds to restriction of Weil-Deligne representations from $W_F$ to $W_E$ under the local Langlands correspondence, and this relation is completely obvious on the Galois side, since the Frobenius of $E$ is the square of the Frobenius of $F$.)

$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .