Timeline for The effect of base change on the L-function of GL(2)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2016 at 13:40 | vote | accept | Monty | ||
| Jan 23, 2014 at 13:03 | history | edited | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 22, 2014 at 11:50 | answer | added | David Loeffler | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 22, 2014 at 10:05 | comment | added | Monty | @David, you are right. $\chi_i$ are unramified characters. | |
| Jan 22, 2014 at 7:34 | comment | added | David Loeffler | Do you mean to assume that $\chi_i$ are unramified characters? | |
| Jan 22, 2014 at 3:05 | comment | added | Monty | @Garrett, you are right!, E is unramified extension. I missed it. | |
| Jan 21, 2014 at 20:45 | comment | added | paul garrett | Is $E$ meant to be the unique unramified extension (in char not $2$? | |
| Jan 21, 2014 at 19:59 | history | edited | Noah Schweber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 21, 2014 at 19:37 | history | asked | Monty | CC BY-SA 3.0 |