3
$\begingroup$

Let $F$ be a local field (whose residue field is $q$) and $E$ its quadratic extension. Let $\pi$ be a irreducible principal series representation $\pi(\chi_1, \chi_2)$ of $GL_F(2)$ especially where $\chi_1, \chi_2$ are unitary characters. Then I know $L_F(s,\pi)=\frac{1}{1-\chi_1(\varpi)q^s} \cdot \frac{1}{1-\chi_2(\varpi)q^s}$. Then what is $L_E(s,BC(\pi))$ in terms of $\chi_1, \chi_2$?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Is $E$ meant to be the unique unramified extension (in char not $2$? $\endgroup$ Jan 21, 2014 at 20:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Garrett, you are right!, E is unramified extension. I missed it. $\endgroup$
    – Monty
    Jan 22, 2014 at 3:05
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean to assume that $\chi_i$ are unramified characters? $\endgroup$ Jan 22, 2014 at 7:34
  • $\begingroup$ @David, you are right. $\chi_i$ are unramified characters. $\endgroup$
    – Monty
    Jan 22, 2014 at 10:05

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

If $\pi = \pi(\chi_1, \chi_2)$ is an irreducible principal series, then $BC(\pi)$ is the irreducible principal series attached to the unramified characters $\chi_i \circ N_{E/F}$ of $E^\times$. So if the $\chi_i$ are unramified then we have

$$L_E(s, BC(\pi)) = (1 - \chi_1(\varpi)^2 q^{-2s})^{-1}(1 - \chi_2(\varpi)^2 q^{-2s})^{-1}.$$

(The point of base change is that it corresponds to restriction of Weil-Deligne representations from $W_F$ to $W_E$ under the local Langlands correspondence, and this relation is completely obvious on the Galois side, since the Frobenius of $E$ is the square of the Frobenius of $F$.)

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.