Skip to main content
added 1 character in body; edited title
Source Link
bambi
  • 375
  • 3
  • 14

Series representation for $\log(|\zeta(\frac{1}{2}+it)|$|)$

(Question is short and straight-forward. )

What is/are "nice and non-trivial" series representation/s of $\log(|\zeta(\frac{1}{2}+it)|$$\log(|\zeta(\frac{1}{2}+it)|)$ ??

By "nice and non-trivial" I mean contains no more than double sum and no direct Taylor expansion

Series representation for $\log(|\zeta(\frac{1}{2}+it)|$

(Question is short and straight-forward. )

What is/are "nice and non-trivial" series representation/s of $\log(|\zeta(\frac{1}{2}+it)|$ ??

By "nice and non-trivial" I mean contains no more than double sum and no direct Taylor expansion

Series representation for $\log(|\zeta(\frac{1}{2}+it)|)$

(Question is short and straight-forward. )

What is/are "nice and non-trivial" series representation/s of $\log(|\zeta(\frac{1}{2}+it)|)$ ??

By "nice and non-trivial" I mean contains no more than double sum and no direct Taylor expansion

Source Link
bambi
  • 375
  • 3
  • 14

Series representation for $\log(|\zeta(\frac{1}{2}+it)|$

(Question is short and straight-forward. )

What is/are "nice and non-trivial" series representation/s of $\log(|\zeta(\frac{1}{2}+it)|$ ??

By "nice and non-trivial" I mean contains no more than double sum and no direct Taylor expansion