Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

Notice removed Canonical answer required by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
edited body
Source Link
Riku
Riku
  • 839
  • 6
  • 17

What is the difference between the notions of

of an ODE $\dot \Phi(t,x) = b(t,\Phi(t,x))$, with initial condition $\Phi(0,x) = x$, where $b$ is a non-smooth (that is, non-Lipschitz) vector field?

In general, are they related in any way? Under which (non-trivial) assumptions are they equivalent? Which is the strongest notion of solutions between these?

What is the difference between the notions of

of an ODE $\dot \Phi(t,x) = b(t,\Phi(t,x))$, with initial condition $\Phi(0,x) = x$, where $b$ is a non-smooth (that is, non-Lipschitz) vector field?

In general, are they related in any way? Under which (non-trivial) assumptions are they equivalent? Which is the strongest notion of solutions between these?

What is the difference between the notions of

of an ODE $\dot \Phi(t,x) = b(t,\Phi(t,x))$, with initial condition $\Phi(0,x) = x$, where $b$ is a non-smooth (that is, non-Lipschitz) vector field?

In general, are they related in any way? Under which (non-trivial) assumptions are they equivalent? Which is the strongest notion of solutions between these?

Notice added Canonical answer required by Riku
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Riku
edited title
Link
Riku
Riku
  • 839
  • 6
  • 17

Different Relationship between three different definitions of solutions for ODE with irregular coefficient

Source Link
Riku
Riku
  • 839
  • 6
  • 17

Different definitions of solutions for ODE with irregular coefficient

What is the difference between the notions of

of an ODE $\dot \Phi(t,x) = b(t,\Phi(t,x))$, with initial condition $\Phi(0,x) = x$, where $b$ is a non-smooth (that is, non-Lipschitz) vector field?

In general, are they related in any way? Under which (non-trivial) assumptions are they equivalent? Which is the strongest notion of solutions between these?