Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with lo.logic
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 95347
first-order and higher-order logic, model theory, set theory, proof theory, computability theory, formal languages, definability, interplay of syntax and semantics, constructive logic, intuitionism, philosophical logic, modal logic, completeness, Gödel incompleteness, decidability, undecidability, theories of truth, truth revision, consistency.
2
votes
0
answers
111
views
Is this theory synonymous with ZF + Global Choice?
$\textbf{Logic:}$ Mono-sorted first order logic with equality.
$\textbf{Extralogical Primitives: } <, \in$
Define: $x > y \iff y < x \\ x \leq y \iff x < y \lor x=y \\ x \not > y \iff \neg \, x > y $ …
- 11.3k
5
votes
1
answer
368
views
Are PA and Counting Theory synonymous\bi-interpretable?
The following question is whether $\sf PA$ is synonymous or even bi-interpretable with a theory about counting objects in finite sets.
Counting Theory:
$\textbf{Logic:}$ Bi-sorted first order logic wi …
- 11.3k
1
vote
0
answers
83
views
About synonymy relationships around these two theories?
The following question is about patterns of synonymy relationships around two theories, $T^+$ and $\sf PA$.
For purposes of self inclusiveness I'll re-iterate $T$ and its extensions.
$\textbf{Logic:}$ …
- 11.3k
12
votes
1
answer
679
views
Does synonymy seep down to the fragments of theories?
IF we have a synonymous interpretation between two theories $T$ and $H$ that uses translation $\tau$ from the language of $T$ to the language of $H$. Then I'd expect that for a sentence $\mu$ in the …
- 11.3k
-4
votes
0
answers
91
views
Which arithmetic\set theory is synonymous with this theory?
$\textbf{Logic:}$ Mono-sorted first order logic with equality.
$\textbf{Extralogical Primitives: } <, \in$
Define: $x > y \iff y < x$
Define: $x \leq y \iff x < y \lor x=y$
$ \textbf{Axioms:}$
$ \te …
- 11.3k
-4
votes
1
answer
124
views
To which arithmetic\set theory this theory is bi-interpretable?
$\textbf{Logic:}$ Mono-sorted first order logic with equality.
$\textbf{Extralogical Primitives: } <, \in$
$ \textbf{Axioms:}$
$ \textbf{Order:} \ x < y < z \to x < z $
$ \textbf{Finiteness:} \\ …
- 11.3k
-2
votes
1
answer
191
views
Can this theory interpret Peano arithmetic?
Logic: Bi-sorted first order logic with equality, first sort written in lower case range over natural numbers, the second sort written in upper case range over sets of naturals, "$=$" has no syntactic …
- 11.3k
-4
votes
0
answers
176
views
Can ZFC be interpreted in this infinitary logic theory?
Working in language $\mathcal L_{\Omega^+,\Omega^+}$ where $\Omega$ is the first strongly inaccessible cardinal. If we add a primitive partial $\Omega$-ary function $F$ and a primitive constant $\varn …
- 11.3k
-5
votes
0
answers
207
views
Can Cardinality Theory capture ZFC?
Cardinality Theory "CT" is a theory of sets of cardinals and links between them, only sets of cardinals can be assigned cardinalities. The links are unordered edges linking cardinals, they serve to de …
- 11.3k
2
votes
2
answers
320
views
Are there models of ZF in which all uncountable sets are super/hyper/ultra-singular?
This question is a follow up to that posting.
Recall the definition of super/hyper/ultra-singular set given in the linked posting.
Is there a model of $\sf ZF$ in which every uncountable set is super …
- 11.3k
5
votes
1
answer
409
views
What is the relationship between non-existence of those kinds of singular sets and AC?
Let's say a set $A$ is super-singular, if and only if, there exists a set $x$ such that $|A|=|\bigcup x|$ and $| A| > |x|$, and for each $y \in x$ we have: $ |y| \not > |x|$ .
A set $A$ is hyper-sin …
- 11.3k
2
votes
0
answers
105
views
Can we have the set world obeying Quine's New Foundations with its well-founded realm obeyin...
Is this theory consistent?
Language: first order language of set theory,
Extra-logical axioms:
1. Extensionality: as in $\sf NF$.
2. Stratified Comprehension: as in $\sf NF$.
Define: a set is said …
- 11.3k
2
votes
2
answers
161
views
Can the Category of that kind of small sets in $\sf NFU$ be Cartesian closed?
Working in Quine's $\sf NFU$, with urelements being at least as many as sets. Formally the latter is: $|Ur| \geq |Set|$.
Where $Ur$ is the set of all urelements and $Set$ is the set of all sets. We sh …
- 11.3k
6
votes
1
answer
152
views
Can there exist a set of all transitive sets in a model of NF or NFU?
Is it consistent with $\sf NF$ or $\sf NFU$ to have a set of all transitive sets? Formally:
$\exists t \forall x (x \in t \leftrightarrow x \text { is transitive})$
Where "$x$ is transitive" means tha …
- 11.3k
-4
votes
1
answer
134
views
About the definitions of well-foundedness in this extension of NFU that interprets ZFC?
Lets see how the world of sets could look like from the perspective of $\sf NFU$. So, here we work within the first order language of set theory, with the following extra-logical axioms:
1. Quine atom …
- 11.3k