Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 717

A branch of algebraic topology concerning the study of cocycles and coboundaries. It is in some sense a dual theory to homology theory. This tag can be further specialized by using it in conjunction with the tags group-cohomology, etale-cohomology, sheaf-cohomology, galois-cohomology, lie-algebra-cohomology, motivic-cohomology, equivariant-cohomology, ...

83 votes
6 answers
16k views

What is a cohomology theory (seriously)?

Is there a unifying concept behind everything that is called a "cohomology theory"? … I know that there exist generalized cohomology theories, Weil cohomology theories and perhaps one might include delta-functors, which describe (some of) the properties of explicit cohomology theories. …
user717's user avatar
  • 5,243
5 votes

What is a cup-product in group cohomology, and how does it relate to other branches of mathe...

You should definitely take a look at Lang's "Topics in Cohomology of Groups", chapter 4. There a general notion of cup-products on delta-functors is introduced. …
user717's user avatar
  • 5,243
2 votes

Dolbeault cohomology

If I remember right there should be something in "Differential Analysis on Complex Manifolds" by Wells.
user717's user avatar
  • 5,243
1 vote
1 answer
1k views

Neukirch's class field axiom and cohomology of units for unramified extension

question may be too detailed but perhaps somebody knows the answer: Neukirch proofs in his algebraic number theory book in Chapter IV, Proposition 6.2, that his class field axiom implies that the Tate cohomology
user717's user avatar
  • 5,243