Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with root-systems
Search options not deleted
user 65801
4
votes
Fixed Points of the Weyl Group action on a Maximal Torus and the Center of a Reductive Group
In general one has $T^W = Z(G) \times (\mathbb{Z}/2)^r$ where $r$ is the number of direct factors in $G$ isomorphic to $\text{SO}_{2n+1}$ ($n\geq 1$) except for the case $\text{char}(k)=2$ where $r=0$ …
- 1,907
6
votes
Why, conceptually, does the torus normalizer in $G_2$ split?
While the following might not be conceptual, but at least it's simple if one knows group cohomology. The obstruction to splitting lives in $H^2(W;T)$, and we have $H^n(W;T)=0$ for all $n\geq 0$!
One w …
- 1,907