Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 58366

Algebras of operators on Hilbert space, $C^*-$algebras, von Neumann algebras, non-commutative geometry

5 votes
0 answers
217 views

When is it true that $Z(A)^{**} = Z(A^{**})$ for a C*-algebra $A$?

For a (unital) C$^*$-algebra $A$ with centre $Z(A)$ the bidual $A^{**}$ is a von Neumann algebra with centre $Z(A^{**})$ for which I believe that $Z(A)^{**} \subset Z(A^{**})$ holds by extending the p …
Mark Roelands's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
244 views

Commutation preserving operators

Let $A$ and $B$ be unital $C$*-algebras and let $T\colon A\to B$ be a bounded linear bijection that preserves commuting elements, i.e., $ab=ba$ implies $TaTb=TbTa$. Does $T^{**}$ then also preserve co …
Mark Roelands's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
207 views

Commutative direct summands of C*-algebras

I have a question about commutative direct summands of $C$*-algebras. Let $A$ be a $C$*-algebra (with unit) and suppose that its bidual $A^{**}$ has a commutative direct summand, that is, $A^{**}=B\o …
Mark Roelands's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
337 views

Commuting nets for commuting projections

I think this should not be too difficult, but I am not an expert. I did not get an answer on stackexchange. Let $A$ be a $C$*-algebra and let $p,q\in A^{**}$ be two commuting projections. Then there …
Mark Roelands's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
237 views

A characterisation of certain $C^*$-algebras

I was wondering if there is a characterisation for $C^*$-algebras (unital) for which the bidual does not have any central atoms. It is not sufficient for example to demand that the $C^*$-algebra does …
Mark Roelands's user avatar