Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
The representation of functions (or objects which are in some generalize the notion of function) as constant linear combinations of sines and cosines at integer multiples of a given frequency, as Fourier transforms or as Fourier integrals.
22
votes
Accepted
When I can safely assume that a function is a Laplace transform of other function?
The answer depends on the class of functions $\phi(t):(0,\infty)\to\mathbb R$ where you want to define the Laplace transform. A standard assumption is that
$$e^{-ct}\phi(t)\in L^2(0,\infty)\tag{1}\lab …
10
votes
Why is Fourier analysis so handy for proving the isoperimetric inequality?
I'd like to add a few words on what happens in higher dimensions. First, a convexity assumption becomes essential (as in the second proof of Hurwitz which works only for convex domains). The isoperime …
7
votes
Accepted
Decay of the Fourier transform
This is not true without additional integrability conditions on $f(\cdot+iy)$.
$\hat{f}(w)=o(e^{-a|w|})$ implies that $e^{b|w|}\hat{f}(w)\in L_2(\mathbb{R})$ for all $b < a$. The latter inclusion h …
5
votes
Fourier transform of fractional differential operator and Plancherel formula equivalent for ...
I'd like to add a little bit to the answers by Dick Palais and Denis Serre.
The standard way to define a fractional derivative of order $\alpha>0$ on the real axis is via the Riemann-Liouville integr …
3
votes
Why do Littlewood-Paley projections behave like iid random variables
There is a quantitative way to express the somewhat vague notion of "almost independence of the Littlewood-Paley projections".
Let $\mathcal F_n$, $n\in\mathbb Z$, be the minimal $\sigma$-algebra gene …