Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with fourier-analysis
Search options not deleted
user 5371
The representation of functions (or objects which are in some generalize the notion of function) as constant linear combinations of sines and cosines at integer multiples of a given frequency, as Fourier transforms or as Fourier integrals.
5
votes
Fourier transform of fractional differential operator and Plancherel formula equivalent for ...
I'd like to add a little bit to the answers by Dick Palais and Denis Serre.
The standard way to define a fractional derivative of order $\alpha>0$ on the real axis is via the Riemann-Liouville integr …
- 1,446
3
votes
Why do Littlewood-Paley projections behave like iid random variables
There is a quantitative way to express the somewhat vague notion of "almost independence of the Littlewood-Paley projections".
Let $\mathcal F_n$, $n\in\mathbb Z$, be the minimal $\sigma$-algebra gene …
- 1,446
22
votes
Accepted
When I can safely assume that a function is a Laplace transform of other function?
The answer depends on the class of functions $\phi(t):(0,\infty)\to\mathbb R$ where you want to define the Laplace transform. A standard assumption is that
$$e^{-ct}\phi(t)\in L^2(0,\infty)\tag{1}\lab …
- 12.9k
7
votes
Accepted
Decay of the Fourier transform
This is not true without additional integrability conditions on $f(\cdot+iy)$.
$\hat{f}(w)=o(e^{-a|w|})$ implies that $e^{b|w|}\hat{f}(w)\in L_2(\mathbb{R})$ for all $b < a$. The latter inclusion h …
- 22.3k
10
votes
Why is Fourier analysis so handy for proving the isoperimetric inequality?
I'd like to add a few words on what happens in higher dimensions. First, a convexity assumption becomes essential (as in the second proof of Hurwitz which works only for convex domains). The isoperime …
- 22.3k