Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 4692

Questions that are about research in mathematics, or about the job of a research mathematician, without being mathematical problems or statements in the strictest sense. Do not use this tag for easy or supposedly easy mathematical questions.

7 votes

Mathematics as a hobby

I do it as a hobby, but then again that is due to my woeful academic record putting academia out of reach. You don't need to do anything funky to improve your mathematics, you just need time. Look at …
30 votes
11 answers
3k views

Are there situations when regarding isomorphic objects as identical leads to mistakes?

If there are not, then would it be easier to say that 2 objects are identical as ordered fields as opposed to being isomorphic as ordered fields? Or is the word isomorphism used to emphasise the fact …
teil's user avatar
  • 4,351
29 votes
4 answers
5k views

Why is it so difficult to write complete (computer verifiable) proofs?

For example I have read that is agony to give a complete proof of the Jordan curve theorem. Since all statements are meant to be justified by the postulates, where does the difficulty lie?
teil's user avatar
  • 4,351
22 votes
5 answers
4k views

Why are noetherian rings such natural objects in algebraic geometry?

I assume it is partially because they are good generalizations of polynomial rings, but what makes this generalization better than graded algebras or other generalizations of polynomial rings?
teil's user avatar
  • 4,351
3 votes

Quick proofs of hard theorems

The fundamental theorem of calculus; all the long and difficult proofs of Eudoxus and Archimedes became clear and simple. Similarly with co-ordinate geometry.
2 votes

Quick proofs of hard theorems

Power series. Both conceptually and computationally, in the 17th century they replaced a multitude of ad-hoc methods that had been used for millennia.
9 votes
2 answers
1k views

Did Joseph Doob prove that random sequences don't exist?

In the book "The Mathematical Experience" it says: "An infinite [binary] sequence $x_1, x_2, \ldots$ is called random in the sense of von Mises if every infinite sequence $x_{n_1}, x_{n_2}, \ldot …
teil's user avatar
  • 4,351
6 votes
1 answer
631 views

Can algebraic number fields be generalized in a similar way to function fields in 1 variable...

Global fields consist of finite extensions of $\mathbb{Q}$ (algebraic number fields) and finite extensions of $\mathbb{F}_q(x)$ (function fields in 1 variable over a finite field). The latter are isom …
teil's user avatar
  • 4,351