Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 461

first-order and higher-order logic, model theory, set theory, proof theory, computability theory, formal languages, definability, interplay of syntax and semantics, constructive logic, intuitionism, philosophical logic, modal logic, completeness, Gödel incompleteness, decidability, undecidability, theories of truth, truth revision, consistency.

100 votes
16 answers
29k views

What if Current Foundations of Mathematics are Inconsistent? [closed]

The title of the question is also the title of a talk by Vladimir Voevodsky, available here. Had this kind of opinion been expressed before? EDIT. Thanks to all answerers, commentators, voters, an …
6 votes
0 answers
198 views

Isomorphism of hyperreal fields viewed as extensions of the field of reals

I asked this question on Mathematics Stackexchange but got no answer. Question. Does $ZFC$ prove that there are non-principal ultrafilters $\mathcal U$ and $\mathcal V$ over $\mathbb N$ such that the …
Pierre-Yves Gaillard's user avatar
4 votes

Is PA consistent? do we know it?

Here are four quotes: Quote 1. Vladimir Voevodsky "To put it very shortly I think that inconsistency of Peano arithmetic as well as inconsistency of ZFC are open and very interesting problems in mat …
2 votes

What does it mean for a mathematical statement to be true?

In my humble opinion, the best reference for this kind of questions is Bourbaki's "Set Theory" ... Actually, I would recommend Bourbaki's book to people who, like me, have trouble to understand other …
1 vote

How would one even begin to try to prove that a simple number-theoretic statement is undecid...

EDIT Here is my problem. To prove that statement S is undecidable is to (1) prove that one cannot prove S. I think I understand the meaning of the second "prove". (It depends of course on the cont …
Pierre-Yves Gaillard's user avatar