Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Algebraic varieties, stacks, sheaves, schemes, moduli spaces, complex geometry, quantum cohomology.
15
votes
Accepted
Enriques surfaces over $\mathbb Z$
A preprint by Stefan Schröer came out today with the answer to this question: arXiv:2004.07025.
No such Enriques surface exists. In fact, there is no classical Enriques surface over $\mathbb F_2$ wit …
1
vote
0
answers
104
views
Action on cohomology by automorphisms of ihs manifolds
For all known deformation types of irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds (which I call K3, K3$^n$, Kum$^n$, OG$^3$, OG$^5$, the exponent being half the complex dimension), it is known that the …
2
votes
0
answers
97
views
Monodromy operators on hyperkähler varieties
Let $X$ be a hyperkähler variety.
In an article (Conjecture 2.1) from some years ago, Markman conjectured that any monodromy operator acting trivially on $H^2(X,\mathbb Z)$ is the identity operator, a …
5
votes
0
answers
167
views
Explicit Enriques involutions on the Fermat quartic surface
Let $X$ be the complex Fermat quartic surface defined by the polynomial $x^4+y^4+z^4+w^4$.
By results of Sertöz, we know that the surface $X$ admits at least one Enriques involution, i.e. an involuti …
7
votes
1
answer
589
views
Discriminant locus of elliptic K3 surfaces
Given a complex elliptic K3 surface $\pi\colon X\rightarrow \mathbb P^1$, its discriminant locus is the divisor $$D = \sum_{i = 1}^s n_i P_i$$ on $\mathbb P^1$ such that $n_i$ is equal to the Euler-Po …
3
votes
0
answers
215
views
Cohomology of the Hilbert square of a degree 14 K3 surface [Beauville-Donagi]
I have a question about the article by Beauville-Donagi called La variété des droites d'une hypersurface cubique de dimension 4 (C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, t. 301, Série I, n° 14, 1985).
Their construct …
5
votes
2
answers
275
views
Singular abelian surfaces that can be defined over $\mathbb Q$
An abelian surface $A$ is called singular if it has maximal Picard number $\rho(A) = 4$.
By work of Shioda-Mitani, any singular abelian surface $A$ is the product $A = E_1 \times E_2$ of two isogeno …
5
votes
0
answers
993
views
Base change of integral scheme of finite type over a field
Let $X$ be an integral scheme of finite type over a field $k$. If $k'\supseteq k$ is a field extension, then $X' = X\otimes_k k'$ is not necessarily integral.
Why does each irreducible component o …
2
votes
Accepted
A question regarding lines on a cubic surface
To each automorphism of the binary form there correspond actually $d$ lines, not only one. In case $d = 3$, since there are always 6 automorphisms, we get $6\cdot 3 = 18$ lines, which summed to the 9 …
9
votes
1
answer
714
views
Surjective morphism from $X$ to itself is finite
Let $X$ be a projective variety. Why is any surjective morphism from $X$ to itself finite?
6
votes
2
answers
400
views
adjacency matrix of a graph and lines on quartic surfaces
Suppose you are given a smooth quartic surface $X$ in $\mathbb P^3$. I would like to find an upper bound for the number of lines on $X$ in the case that there is no plane intersecting the curves in fo …
5
votes
1
answer
281
views
Euler number for base change of a K3 surface
Suppose you have a K3 surface $S$ containing a smooth rational curve $C$ and suppose you have an elliptic fibration $S \rightarrow \mathbb P^1$ that restricts to a morphism $C \rightarrow \mathbb P^1$ …
1
vote
Linear system corresponding to rational curves on a K3 surface
A base-point free linear system has non-negative self-intersection, so at least one of the two components of $C+D$ must lie in the base locus of $|C+D|$. But if one component were moving it would have …