Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Theory and applications of probability and stochastic processes: e.g. central limit theorems, large deviations, stochastic differential equations, models from statistical mechanics, queuing theory.
7
votes
Quick derivation of classical probability theory from von Neumann algebraic framework
I am not sure how far you want to go, but some basics are explained in this answer:
Is there an introduction to probability theory from a structuralist/categorical perspective?
In particular, you have …
4
votes
Accepted
Image of probability measures under measurable mappings
There is a complete classification of probability spaces up to a measure-preserving
isomorphism.
Specifically, consider a category whose objects are triples
(X,Σ,μ), where X is a set, Σ is a σ-algebr …
2
votes
Non-probabilist term for conditional expectation?
Yes, it's called a pushforward!
For more details, see this answer:
Conditional Expectation for $\sigma$-finite measures
6
votes
Conditional Expectation for $\sigma$-finite measures
One can define a reasonable notion of conditional expectation
for arbitrary localizable measurable spaces, not necessarily σ-finite.
This is explained in great detail in the answer to
Is there an intr …
11
votes
Why do probabilists take random variables to be Borel (and not Lebesgue) measurable?
A conceptual answer can be given in the framework of this answer.
The functor that sends a measurable space X to the set of random variables on X,
i.e., equivalence classes of (unbounded) real or com …
232
votes
Accepted
Is there an introduction to probability theory from a structuralist/categorical perspective?
$\def\Spec{\mathop{\rm Spec}}
\def\R{{\bf R}}
\def\Ep{{\rm E}^+}
\def\L{{\rm L}}
\def\EpL{\Ep\L}$
One can argue that an object of the right category of spaces in measure theory is not a set equipped w …
10
votes
What's the use of a complete measure?
From the categorical viewpoint there is no difference, because the category of measurable spaces is equivalent
to the category of complete measurable spaces with the equivalence given by the completio …