Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options questions only not deleted user 3634

Homotopy theory is an important sub-field of algebraic topology. It is mainly concerned with the properties and structures of spaces which are invariant under homotopy. Chief among these are the homotopy groups of spaces, specifically those of spheres. Homotopy theory includes a broad set of ideas and techniques, such as cohomology theories, spectra and stable homotopy theory, model categories, spectral sequences, and classifying spaces.

13 votes
2 answers
2k views

Quasifibrations and homotopy pullbacks

I'm wondering about the theoretical placement of quasifibrations. One nice thing about "weak fibrations" (maps homotopy equivalent in the category of maps to Hurewicz fibrations) is that a pullback s …
7 votes
1 answer
200 views

Quasifibrations and transfinite filtrations

This question takes place in the category $\mathrm{CGWH}$ of compactly generated weak Hausdorff spaces. Let $\lambda$ be a limit ordinal, and suppose we have a diagram $\Phi: \lambda \to \mathrm{CGWH} …
3 votes
0 answers
106 views

Exponential law and cones reference

Given a map $\omega: A\to \Omega X$, one can set up the diagram and construct the map $\sigma : \Sigma A\to X$. It's pretty easy to check that the homotopy classes of $\omega$ and $\sigma$ correspond …
1 vote
0 answers
139 views

Terminology for an kind-of principal fibration

My interest is in topological monoids, but I think the question may make sense (in some fashion) for monoids of sets. Let $M$ be a topological monoid, and let $X$ be a pointed space that $M$ acts on, …
8 votes
1 answer
260 views

Pointed versus unpointed maps into a topological monoid

I've just stumbled on something that seems either too good to be true, or else too good for me not to have heard of it before. It has to do with the basepoint forgetting map $$ u: [A, M] \to \langle A …
2 votes
0 answers
209 views

Products of cones and cones of joins

The join of $A$ and $B$ is the pushout of the diagram $$ CA \times B \gets A\times B \to A\times CB, $$ which can be formulated in either the pointed or unpointed topological category. This pushout is …
9 votes
0 answers
379 views

When is an increasing union a colimit?

Let's consider a diagram $\Phi: \lambda \to \mathcal{T}_*$ $$ X_0 \to X_1 \to \cdots \to X_\xi \to X_{\xi+1} \to \cdots $$ of pointed spaces, indexed by some ordinal $\lambda$, in which each $X_\xi$ i …
12 votes
1 answer
734 views

Open subspaces of CW complexes

I am looking at the paper Covering homotopy properties of maps between CW complexes or ANRs by Mark Steinberger and James West and a claim is made in the proof of their first main theorem t …
7 votes
0 answers
107 views

Stable splitting of products

This question concerns the well-known homotopy equivalence $$ \Sigma (X\times Y) \simeq \Sigma (X \vee \ Y) \vee \Sigma (X\wedge Y) $$ (I'm happy to use only CW complexes). I can see that there is …
4 votes
0 answers
92 views

Homotopy colimits of long sequences

Let $\lambda$ be a limit ordinal, and let $F: \lambda\to \mathcal{T}_*$ be a diagram of pointed spaces with shape $\lambda$. Write $X = F(0)$ and $Y = \mathrm{hocolim} F$. I believe it to be true (I …
8 votes
1 answer
219 views

Splitting low-dimensional $p$-local CW complexes for large $p$

Fix a prime $p$. I have a sketch of a proof that if $X$ is a finite simply-connected CW complex with $\mathrm{dim}(X) < p$ then for some $t\in \mathbb{N}$, the $p$-localization $\Sigma^t X_{(p)}$ is …
19 votes
4 answers
2k views

Difference between represented and singular cohomology?

Ordinary cohomology on CW complexes is determined by the coefficients. There are (more than) two nice ways to define cohomology for non-CW-complexes: either by singular cohomology or by defining $\ …
38 votes
2 answers
2k views

Finite complexes whose homotopy groups are not "finitely generated"

I'll say $K$ has "finitely generated" homotopy groups if there is a finite wedge of spheres $W = \bigvee S^{n_i}$ and a map $f: W\to K$ which induces a surjection on $\pi_*$. It seems likely that t …
4 votes
0 answers
193 views

Some notation from a paper by H. Toda

I'm trying to read Toda's paper "Complex of the standard paths and n-ad homotopy groups" and I'm running into trouble with a definition---here's the text (slightly rephrased) Let $K$ be a CW-compl …
9 votes
1 answer
294 views

Retracting a wedge of spheres off a homotopy fiber

There is a general principle that, for finite simply-connected CW complexes, things that are true rationally are usually true once you localize away from a finite list of primes. I'm interested in …

15 30 50 per page