Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with ra.rings-and-algebras
Search options not deleted
user 35416
Non-commutative rings and algebras, non-associative algebras, universal algebra and lattice theory, linear algebra, semigroups. For questions specific to commutative algebra (that is, rings that are assumed both associative and commutative), rather use the tag ac.commutative-algebra.
5
votes
Structure theorem for finitely generated Z[G] modules
The answer to your question is 'no'. Even if you limit yourself to modules that are free over $\mathbb{Z}$, there is no classification known. Indeed, if your abelian group is not cyclic or its order i …
- 13k
14
votes
Algebra with a certain abelian group as the multiplicative group
I am going to assume that by "algebra" you simply mean a ring.
The answer is "no", in general. For example $\mathbb{Z}/5\mathbb{Z}$ is not the unit group of a ring. Indeed, suppose it was the unit gro …
- 13k
7
votes
Accepted
Wedderburn decomposition of special linear groups
$\DeclareMathOperator\M{M}\DeclareMathOperator\Gal{Gal}\DeclareMathOperator\End{End}$As has been mentioned in the comments, the question for algebraically closed fields of characteristic $0$ is equiva …
- 13k