Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 31233

Algebraic varieties, stacks, sheaves, schemes, moduli spaces, complex geometry, quantum cohomology.

41 votes
Accepted

Joyal's construction of the spectrum of a commutative ring

Since I don't know precisely which parts of Lawvere's article you have difficulties with, this answer is a bit a long and tries to give a bit of context. If you want me to be more specific at some poi …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
1k views

Does every sheaf embed into a quasicoherent sheaf?

Question. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules. Is there always a quasicoherent sheaf $\mathcal{E}'$ together with a monomorphism $\mathcal{E} \to \mathcal{E}'$ …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
11 votes
Accepted

Properties of the petit Zariski topos

Unfortunately I don't know an interesting intrinsically formulated sufficient criterion for a locally ringed topos to be the little Zariski topos of a scheme. This is an extremely interesting question …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
11 votes

What does the Zariski topos of $\mathbb{P}^1$ classify?

First note that a morphism $\operatorname{Spec}(A) \to \mathbb{P}^1$ is just given by an element of the "classical projective space" $\mathbb{P}^1(A) = \{ [a:b] \,|\, \text{$a$ is invertible or $b$ is …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Points of the big Zariski site

Let's simplify and consider the presheaf topos. I asked the same question over at the nForum a while back. There Marc Hoyois reminded me of the following quite general fact: The category of topos-the …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Classifying Space of "Valuation Ringed Spaces over a Topos"

Since the axioms describing what a valuation ring can be put as what's called geometric sequents [*], by the fundamental theorem on classifying toposes, there is a topos $T_{val}$ with precisely the u …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
7 votes

Is there a correction to the failure of geometric morphisms to preserve internal homs?

My position would be: It is a fundamental feature of pullback along geometric morphisms to not preserve exponentials. But, given objects $X$ and $Y$ in a topos, we can do more than just form the expon …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
6 votes

Construction of the petit Zariski topos out of the gros topos of a scheme

Many of these toposes admit descriptions as internal classifying toposes, hence indeed enjoy useful universal properties. Here is a selection of such descriptions: Constructing the big Zariski topos …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
5 votes

Is there a universal property for graded localization?

It seems that Martin has provided the answer which Daniel sought. But the question in the title doesn't appear to be answered yet: Is there a universal property for graded localization? More precisely …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
3 votes

Does 'finite + finitely presented as an algebra' equal 'finitely presented as a module'?

It appears that in the meantime, full proofs have been added to the Stacks Project. Tag 0564. Let $R \to S$ be a finite and finitely presented ring map. Let $M$ be an $S$-module. Then $M$ is finit …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
3 votes

What does an ideal correspond to in the internal language of sheaves?

I assume that you mean that $\mathcal{F}$ is a sheaf of rings. What's internally an ideal of $\mathcal{F}$ is externally simply a sheaf of ideals. In case that the topos in question is the little Za …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
3 votes

Can the methods of classical algebraic geometry be made rigorous with a synthetic approach?

Is it possible to do algebraic geometry in a synthetic manner that enables rigorous reasoning but is closer to the style of argument employed by classical algebraic geometers? I sure hope so. You …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
1 vote

Affine communication lemma and finite limits in the category of rings

I think that Section 11 on transfer principles in these notes of mine is what you're looking for. A general machinery abstracts the business of tracking all the $f_i$'s and the required high powers. T …
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar